linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] docs: Improve grammar in Userspace API/DVB API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5dad612b-495b-4f1c-82ff-e8ed4ef34c07@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:33:12 +0300
From: Hanne-Lotta Mäenpää <hannelotta@...il.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
 ribalda@...omium.org, hverkuil@...all.nl, hljunggr@...co.com,
 dave.jiang@...el.com, jgg@...pe.ca, saeedm@...dia.com,
 Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, corbet@....net, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
 mario.limonciello@....com, W_Armin@....de, mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca,
 skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] docs: Improve grammar in Userspace API/DVB API

On 5/23/25 08:58, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 02:52:52PM +0300, Hanne-Lotta Mäenpää wrote:
>>     #. On Satellite and Cable delivery systems, the bandwidth depends on
>> -     the symbol rate. So, the Kernel will silently ignore any setting
>> -     :ref:`DTV-BANDWIDTH-HZ`. I will however fill it back with a
>> -     bandwidth estimation.
>> +     the symbol rate. The kernel will silently ignore any setting
>> +     :ref:`DTV-BANDWIDTH-HZ` and overwrites it with bandwidth estimation.
> "The kernel will silently ignore any :ref:`DTV-BANDWIDTH-HZ` setting ..."
>>   
>>        Such bandwidth estimation takes into account the symbol rate set with
>>        :ref:`DTV-SYMBOL-RATE`, and the rolloff factor, with is fixed for
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Hello,

What is the best way to send an update on this patch, now that patches 
3/4 and 4/4 have been applied, but 1/4 and 2/4 have not been applied?

Do I send v3 for the first two only?

Any guidance is greatly appreciated, since I am new to kernel development.

Best regards,

Hanne-Lotta Mäenpää