[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90c50d23-1a70-47e4-a80d-c951f7afc5df@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 14:19:22 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
Cc: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Bajjuri Praneeth <praneeth@...com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm: omap2plus_defconfig: Enable TPS65219
regulator
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 08:09:59AM -0500, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 6/12/25 1:12 AM, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > So there need to be a bunch of patches to add the missing stuff.
> > omap2plus_defconfig is there and support for boards are added.
> Yes multi_v7 is still missing stuff for some boards we want to
> support, and we are working on adding those needed modules now.
> We won't get feature parity in multi_v7 if we keep adding new
> boards to the old omap2plus_defconfig. For this patch series
> how about we add support to both defconfigs?
Keeping the more specific defconfigs around is handy as they're much
smaller and therefore faster to build, but I do agree that the
multi_vX_defconfigs should also work.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists