linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 5/5] io_uring/bpf: add basic kfunc helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e6194c29-18de-4dc9-a2fb-2ad63816481d@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:06:14 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
 bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 5/5] io_uring/bpf: add basic kfunc helpers

On 6/12/25 7:26 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> For next revision please post all selftest, examples,
>> and bpf progs on the list,
>> so people don't need to search github.
> 
> Did the link in the cover letter not work for you? I'm confused
> since it's all in a branch in my tree, but you linked to the same
> patches but in Jens' tree, and I have zero clue what they're
> doing there or how you found them.

Puzzled me too, but if you go there, github will say:

"This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may
 belong to a fork outside of the repository."

which is exactly because it's not in my tree, but in your fork of
my tree. Pretty wonky GH behavior if you ask me, but there it is.

-- 
Jens Axboe