[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd5fbd5bcc0e7ae9ac60a39a93ca8b747e5daeac.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 02:24:32 +0000
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com"
<seanjc@...gle.com>, "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>
CC: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/18] KVM: x86: Rename irqchip_kernel() to
irqchip_full()
On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 14:35 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Rename irqchip_kernel() to irqchip_full(), as "kernel" is very ambiguous
> due to the existence of split IRQ chip support, where only some of the
> "irqchip" is in emulated by the kernel/KVM. E.g. irqchip_kernel() often
"is in emulated" -> "is emulated".
Or did you mean:
"is emulated in the kernel/KVM"?
> gets confused with irqchip_in_kernel().
>
> Opportunistically hoist the definition up in irq.h so that it's
> co-located with other "full" irqchip code in anticipation of wrapping it
> all with a Kconfig/#ifdef.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists