[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6c1924b-54ae-4d75-95f7-30d3e428e3e7@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:36:35 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Vlastimil Babka
<vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/huge_memory: don't ignore queried cachemode in
vmf_insert_pfn_pud()
On 12.06.25 17:28, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 02:06:52PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> We setup the cache mode but ... don't forward the updated pgprot to
>> insert_pfn_pud().
>>
>> Only a problem on x86-64 PAT when mapping PFNs using PUDs that
>> require a special cachemode.
>>
>> Fix it by using the proper pgprot where the cachemode was setup.
>>
>> Identified by code inspection.
>>
>> Fixes: 7b806d229ef1 ("mm: remove vmf_insert_pfn_xxx_prot() for huge page-table entries")
>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>
> Nice catch!
>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Thanks! What's your opinion on stable? Really hard to judge the impact ...
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists