[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aEr9+NQA6o0ypSuy@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 12:19:04 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 10/11] PCI: dwc: Print warning message when
cpu_addr_fixup() exists
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 09:38:32PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 11:51:56AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 08:16:03PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:38:46AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > If the parent 'ranges' property in DT correctly describes the address
> > > > translation, the cpu_addr_fixup() callback is not needed. Print a warning
> > > > message to inform users to correct their DTB files and prepare to remove
> > > > cpu_addr_fixup().
> > > >
> > >
> > > This patch seem to have dropped, but I do see a value in printing the warning to
> > > encourage developers/users to fix the DTB in some way. Since we fixed the driver
> > > to parse the DT 'ranges' properly, the presence of cpu_addr_fixup() callback
> > > indicates that the translation is not properly described in DT. So DT has to be
> > > fixed.
> >
> > This patch already in mainline with Bjorn's fine tuned at when merge.
> >
> > fixup = pci->ops ? pci->ops->cpu_addr_fixup : NULL;
> > if (fixup) {
> > fixup_addr = fixup(pci, cpu_phys_addr);
> > if (reg_addr == fixup_addr) {
> > dev_info(dev, "%s reg[%d] %#010llx == %#010llx == fixup(cpu %#010llx); %ps is redundant with this devicetree\n",
> > reg_name, index, reg_addr, fixup_addr,
> > (unsigned long long) cpu_phys_addr, fixup);
> > } else {
> > dev_warn(dev, "%s reg[%d] %#010llx != %#010llx == fixup(cpu %#010llx); devicetree is broken\n",
> > reg_name, index, reg_addr, fixup_addr,
> > (unsigned long long) cpu_phys_addr);
> > reg_addr = fixup_addr;
> > }
> >
> > return cpu_phys_addr - reg_addr;
> > }
> >
> > I have not seen this "dev_warn(pci->dev, "cpu_addr_fixup() usage detected. Please fix your DTB!\n");"
> >
>
> This patch is supposed to add this warning and nothing else.
We can forget this one. Can help check doorbell patch if you have time
https://lore.kernel.org/imx/202506101649.UpwblcVd-lkp@intel.com/T/#t
Frank
>
> - Mani
>
> --
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists