[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250612170317.k3cok3utmiy5ptq3@hiago-nb>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 14:03:17 -0300
From: Hiago De Franco <hiagofranco@...il.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Hiago De Franco <hiago.franco@...adex.com>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
"Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" <iuliana.prodan@....nxp.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] remoteproc: imx_rproc: detect and attach to
pre-booted remote cores
Hi Peng,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:27:09AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for the delay.
> >
> > I tested it now and there must be something missing on my U-Boot:
> >
> > Disable imx8x-cm4 rsrc 278 not owned
> > Disable imx8x-cm4 rsrc 297 not owned
> >
> > It removes my nodes from the DT before starting the kernel, so I cannot
> > attach. Do you know what should I do in this case?
>
> In separate partition case, UBoot will check the permission
> by checking the rsrc-id, saying power domain id.
>
> You may need to remove the power-domains property
> from M4 node.
Without the power-domains property, rproc gives me a kernel panic:
[ 1.253234] remoteproc remoteproc0: imx-rproc is available
[ 1.258501] remoteproc remoteproc0: attaching to imx-rproc
[ 1.263950] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80005ae57d39
[ 1.271812] Mem abort info:
[ 1.274575] ESR = 0x0000000096000005
[ 1.278299] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 1.282581] mmc0: SDHCI controller on 5b010000.mmc [5b010000.mmc] using ADMA
[ 1.283607] SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 1.293701] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 1.296815] FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault
[ 1.301699] Data abort info:
[ 1.304545] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000
[ 1.310079] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
[ 1.315073] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
[ 1.320367] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000096bf3000
[ 1.327061] [ffff80005ae57d39] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=1000000097085003, pud=0000000000000000
[ 1.335750] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP
[ 1.341373] Modules linked in:
[ 1.344414] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 47 Comm: kworker/u16:3 Not tainted 6.16.0-rc1-00024-gfe5d6ab20714-dirty
#857 PREEMPT
[ 1.354932] Hardware name: Toradex Colibri iMX8QXP on Colibri Evaluation Board V3 (DT)
[ 1.362837] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
[ 1.368651] pstate: 00000005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 1.375601] pc : rproc_handle_resources.constprop.0+0x78/0x1d0
[ 1.381421] lr : rproc_boot+0x368/0x578
[ 1.385242] sp : ffff8000819f3990
[ 1.388542] x29: ffff8000819f3990 x28: ffff80005ae57d3d x27: 0000000000000000
[ 1.395671] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0000016ee038 x24: ffff800080f3c680
[ 1.402793] x23: ffff8000813d6da8 x22: 00000000d999ad39 x21: ffff0000016ee000
[ 1.409917] x20: 00000000266656c3 x19: ffff80005ae57d39 x18: 0000000000000006
[ 1.417040] x17: ffff000002020600 x16: ffff000002020000 x15: 4addd15cca11c529
[ 1.424164] x14: 73ebceed5d6cd787 x13: 4addd15cca11c529 x12: 73ebceed5d6cd787
[ 1.431288] x11: 95a4e33b6b190664 x10: 9e3cdabdb09ca345 x9 : ab3734eafdd6fd1c
[ 1.438412] x8 : d58a055de4cfb385 x7 : de97fab1791acbbe x6 : 9946d97107d0dcda
[ 1.445535] x5 : ffff0000032b2c00 x4 : 00000000000003fc x3 : ffff0000032b2b80
[ 1.452659] x2 : fffffffffffffff0 x1 : ffff8000814bd000 x0 : ffff8000814bd000
[ 1.459786] Call trace:
[ 1.462215] rproc_handle_resources.constprop.0+0x78/0x1d0 (P)
[ 1.468036] rproc_boot+0x368/0x578
[ 1.471510] rproc_add+0x180/0x18c
[ 1.474898] imx_rproc_probe+0x3e4/0x540
[ 1.475274] mmc0: new HS400 MMC card at address 0001
[ 1.478799] platform_probe+0x68/0xc0
[ 1.484628] mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 Q2J55L 7.09 GiB
[ 1.487400] really_probe+0xc0/0x38c
[ 1.487412] __driver_probe_device+0x7c/0x15c
[ 1.487424] driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x10c
[ 1.493941] mmcblk0: p1 p2
[ 1.495392] __device_attach_driver+0xbc/0x158
[ 1.495405] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe0
[ 1.495417] __device_attach+0x9c/0x1ac
[ 1.500468] mmcblk0boot0: mmc0:0001 Q2J55L 16.0 MiB
[ 1.503906] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20
[ 1.503918] bus_probe_device+0xac/0xb0
[ 1.503929] deferred_probe_work_func+0x9c/0xec
[ 1.509863] mmcblk0boot1: mmc0:0001 Q2J55L 16.0 MiB
[ 1.511117] process_one_work+0x14c/0x28c
[ 1.511132] worker_thread+0x2cc/0x3d4
[ 1.511142] kthread+0x12c/0x208
[ 1.511157] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
[ 1.517964] mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 Q2J55L 4.00 MiB, chardev (241:0)
[ 1.518770] Code: 8b36c033 9100127c 54000924 d503201f (b9400261)
[ 1.518777] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Currently I have the M4 partiton defined into the SCU code:
/* Create partition */
BRD_ERR(rm_partition_create(pt_boot, &pt_m4_0, SC_FALSE,
SC_TRUE, SC_FALSE, SC_TRUE, SC_FALSE, SC_R_M4_0_PID0,
rsrc_list, ARRAY_SIZE(rsrc_list),
pad_list, ARRAY_SIZE(pad_list),
NULL, 0));
/* Name partition for debug */
PARTITION_NAME(pt_m4_0, "MCU0");
/* Allow AP to use SYSTEM (not production!) */
BRD_ERR(rm_set_peripheral_permissions(SC_PT, SC_R_SYSTEM,
pt_boot, SC_RM_PERM_SEC_RW));
/* Move M4 0 TCM */
BRD_ERR(rm_find_memreg(pt_boot, &mr, 0x034FE0000ULL,
0x034FE0000ULL));
BRD_ERR(rm_assign_memreg(pt_boot, pt_m4_0, mr));
/* Move partition to be owned by SC */
BRD_ERR(rm_set_parent(pt_boot, pt_m4_0, SC_PT));
/* Check if booting with the no_ap flag set */
if (no_ap != SC_FALSE)
{
/* Move boot to be owned by M4 0 for Android Automotive */
BRD_ERR(rm_set_parent(SC_PT, pt_boot, pt_m4_0));
}
}
/* Allow all to access the SEMA42s */
BRD_ERR(rm_set_peripheral_permissions(SC_PT, SC_R_M4_0_SEMA42,
SC_RM_PT_ALL, SC_RM_PERM_FULL));
I believe this SCU code is correct, at least this is more or less what
NXP provides as example, right?
Best Regards,
Hiago.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists