[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250612191105.GE1283@sol>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 12:11:05 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Cc: apparmor@...ts.ubuntu.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apparmor: use SHA-256 library API instead of
crypto_shash API
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:43:30AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> On 5/13/25 21:21, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 12:04:30PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > This user of SHA-256 does not support any other algorithm, so the
> > > crypto_shash abstraction provides no value. Just use the SHA-256
> > > library API instead, which is much simpler and easier to use.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > This patch is targeting the apparmor tree for 6.16.
> > >
> > > security/apparmor/Kconfig | 3 +-
> > > security/apparmor/crypto.c | 85 ++++++--------------------------------
> > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> >
> > Any interest in taking this patch through the apparmor or security trees?
> >
> I can take it through my tree
Thanks! I notice this isn't in v6.16-rc1. Do you have a pull request planned?
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists