lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202506130644.NKPuRVsI-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 06:45:06 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Thomas Fourier <fourier.thomas@...il.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
	Thomas Fourier <fourier.thomas@...il.com>,
	Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drive/realtek/rtlwifi: fix possible memory leak

Hi Thomas,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on wireless-next/main]
[also build test ERROR on wireless/main linus/master v6.16-rc1 next-20250612]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Thomas-Fourier/drive-realtek-rtlwifi-fix-possible-memory-leak/20250612-171134
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wireless/wireless-next.git main
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250612090724.17777-1-fourier.thomas%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] drive/realtek/rtlwifi: fix possible memory leak
config: i386-randconfig-006-20250613 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250613/202506130644.NKPuRVsI-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250613/202506130644.NKPuRVsI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506130644.NKPuRVsI-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/pci.c: In function '_rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc':
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/pci.c:577:39: error: expected ';' before 'return'
     577 |                         kfree_skb(skb)
         |                                       ^
         |                                       ;
     578 |                 return 0;
         |                 ~~~~~~                 


vim +577 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/pci.c

   550	
   551	static int _rtl_pci_init_one_rxdesc(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
   552					    struct sk_buff *new_skb, u8 *entry,
   553					    int rxring_idx, int desc_idx)
   554	{
   555		struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw);
   556		struct rtl_pci *rtlpci = rtl_pcidev(rtl_pcipriv(hw));
   557		u32 bufferaddress;
   558		u8 tmp_one = 1;
   559		struct sk_buff *skb;
   560	
   561		if (likely(new_skb)) {
   562			skb = new_skb;
   563			goto remap;
   564		}
   565		skb = dev_alloc_skb(rtlpci->rxbuffersize);
   566		if (!skb)
   567			return 0;
   568	
   569	remap:
   570		/* just set skb->cb to mapping addr for pci_unmap_single use */
   571		*((dma_addr_t *)skb->cb) =
   572			dma_map_single(&rtlpci->pdev->dev, skb_tail_pointer(skb),
   573				       rtlpci->rxbuffersize, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
   574		bufferaddress = *((dma_addr_t *)skb->cb);
   575		if (dma_mapping_error(&rtlpci->pdev->dev, bufferaddress)) {
   576			if (!new_skb)
 > 577				kfree_skb(skb)
   578			return 0;
   579		}
   580		rtlpci->rx_ring[rxring_idx].rx_buf[desc_idx] = skb;
   581		if (rtlpriv->use_new_trx_flow) {
   582			/* skb->cb may be 64 bit address */
   583			rtlpriv->cfg->ops->set_desc(hw, (u8 *)entry, false,
   584						    HW_DESC_RX_PREPARE,
   585						    (u8 *)(dma_addr_t *)skb->cb);
   586		} else {
   587			rtlpriv->cfg->ops->set_desc(hw, (u8 *)entry, false,
   588						    HW_DESC_RXBUFF_ADDR,
   589						    (u8 *)&bufferaddress);
   590			rtlpriv->cfg->ops->set_desc(hw, (u8 *)entry, false,
   591						    HW_DESC_RXPKT_LEN,
   592						    (u8 *)&rtlpci->rxbuffersize);
   593			rtlpriv->cfg->ops->set_desc(hw, (u8 *)entry, false,
   594						    HW_DESC_RXOWN,
   595						    (u8 *)&tmp_one);
   596		}
   597		return 1;
   598	}
   599	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ