[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250612042005.99602-3-lance.yang@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 12:19:25 +0800
From: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: zi.li@...ux.dev,
anna.schumaker@...cle.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com,
joel.granados@...nel.org,
jstultz@...gle.com,
kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
leonylgao@...cent.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
longman@...hat.com,
mhiramat@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com,
mingzhe.yang@...com,
peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
senozhatsky@...omium.org,
tfiga@...omium.org,
will@...nel.org,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/3] locking/rwsem: clear reader-owner on unlock to reduce false positives
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
When CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK_BLOCKER is enabled, a stale owner pointer in a
reader-owned rwsem can lead to false positives in blocker tracking.
To mitigate this, let’s try to clear the owner field on unlock, as a NULL
owner is better than a stale one for diagnostics.
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 6cb29442d4fc..a310eb9896de 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -205,14 +205,12 @@ bool is_rwsem_reader_owned(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
return false;
return rwsem_test_oflags(sem, RWSEM_READER_OWNED);
}
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS
/*
- * With CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS configured, it will make sure that if there
- * is a task pointer in owner of a reader-owned rwsem, it will be the
- * real owner or one of the real owners. The only exception is when the
- * unlock is done by up_read_non_owner().
+ * With CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS or CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK_BLOCKER configured,
+ * it will make sure that the owner field of a reader-owned rwsem either
+ * points to a real reader-owner(s) or gets cleared. The only exception is
+ * when the unlock is done by up_read_non_owner().
*/
static inline void rwsem_clear_reader_owned(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists