linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] riscv: sophgo: add top syscon device for cv18xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <t26cj5xhmkqro5wgf3vqycvgwqhtwv3x6mo25hde3zretbl5uu@xy5igj6vqejx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:30:17 +0800
From: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, 
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, 
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>, 
	Yu Yuan <yu.yuan@...u.edu.cn>, Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>, Ze Huang <huangze@...t.edu.cn>, 
	Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@...tlin.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] riscv: sophgo: add top syscon device for cv18xx

On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 05:14:59PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 04:24:48PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > Add top syscon device bindings related DTS change for CV1800.
> > 
> > The patch required the following 3 patch series.
> > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611075321.1160973-1-inochiama@gmail.com
> > 2. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611081804.1196397-1-inochiama@gmail.com
> > 3. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611081000.1187374-1-inochiama@gmail.com
> 
> What is RFC about this?

I use RFC to ignore the patch check, as the dependency are not merged.
This series itself require the binding from link 2 3, which provdes
binding of the USB2 phy and DMA multiplexer.

Regards,
Inochi