[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250612081947.94081-3-chao.gao@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 01:19:47 -0700
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com,
dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com,
Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: SVM: Simplify MSR interception logic for IA32_XSS MSR
Use svm_set_intercept_for_msr() directly to configure IA32_XSS MSR
interception, ensuring consistency with other cases where MSRs are
intercepted depending on guest caps and CPUIDs.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
---
With this patch applied, svm_enable_intercept_for_msr() has no user.
Should it be removed?
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 6282c2930cda..504e8a87644a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -4371,11 +4371,9 @@ void sev_es_recalc_msr_intercepts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* XSAVES being exposed to the guest so that KVM can at least honor
* guest CPUID for RDMSR and WRMSR.
*/
- if (guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) &&
- guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES))
- svm_disable_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_XSS, MSR_TYPE_RW);
- else
- svm_enable_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_XSS, MSR_TYPE_RW);
+ svm_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_XSS, MSR_TYPE_RW,
+ !guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) ||
+ !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES));
}
void sev_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
--
2.47.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists