[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250612093227-GYA130879@gentoo>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 09:32:27 +0000
From: Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Guodong Xu <guodong@...cstar.com>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, spacemit@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: defconfig: run savedefconfig to reorder it
Hi Alexandre,
On 10:37 Thu 12 Jun , Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> Hi Yixun,
>
> On 6/11/25 16:56, Yixun Lan wrote:
> > Changes to defconfig should be always updated via 'make
> > savedefconfig', run this command to make it aligned again.
> >
> > This will ease the effort of reviewing changes of defconfig
> > in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>
> > ---
> > Update PDMA config bring in unnecessary changes[1], let's fix
> > it by run savedefconfig first.
>
>
> It would be easier if this patch was part of the PDMA series since the
> last patch will depend on it: @Guodong can you integrate this patch to
> your next revision of your patchset?
>
I'd rather make this patch independent, as nothing strongly ralated with PDMA,
and it probably would take several rounds for PDMA patch to be settled down..
Besides, there is no problem for PDMA patch to depend on this patch if
needed (easy to use b4 to handle this..)
The idea here is to get this patch merged as early as possible, as it's
quite straightforward, and other people may have similar problem instead
of PDMA here
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
--
Yixun Lan (dlan)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists