lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP_z_CjRB6MwNrXW_o_XyWSwcXZKpVHyGZoj1udJU4uBu1iw=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:02:55 -0700
From: Blake Jones <blakejones@...gle.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, 
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>, 
	James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>, 
	Guilherme Amadio <amadio@...too.org>, Yang Jihong <yangjihong@...edance.com>, 
	Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>, Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@...gle.com>, 
	Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com>, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, 
	Zhongqiu Han <quic_zhonhan@...cinc.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@...el.com>, 
	Graham Woodward <graham.woodward@....com>, Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>, 
	Ben Gainey <ben.gainey@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] perf: generate events for BPF metadata

On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:39 PM Blake Jones <blakejones@...gle.com> wrote:
> Is there anything written up about how to set up a machine so that
> "make build-test" works reliably?

Barring that, I've confirmed that each of my new patches builds successfully
under the following build commands: (I have a copy of libbpf that supports
".emit_strings" in /usr/local/include)

    cd tools/perf
    make clean
    make NO_LIBTRACEEVENT=1 LIBBPF_DYNAMIC=1 LIBBPF_INCLUDE=/usr/local/include
    ./perf check feature libbpf-strings

    make clean
    make NO_LIBTRACEEVENT=1
    ./perf check feature libbpf-strings

    make clean
    make NO_LIBTRACEEVENT=1 NO_LIBBPF=1
    ./perf check feature libbpf-strings

Please let me know if that seems like sufficient testing.

Blake

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ