[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87qzznivtp.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:02:10 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tianyang Zhang <zhangtianyang@...ngson.cn>, chenhuacai@...nel.org,
kernel@...0n.name, corbet@....net, alexs@...nel.org, si.yanteng@...ux.dev,
jiaxun.yang@...goat.com, peterz@...radead.org, wangliupu@...ngson.cn,
lvjianmin@...ngson.cn, maobibo@...ngson.cn, siyanteng@...oftware.com.cn,
gaosong@...ngson.cn, yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Super User <root@...alhost.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Loongarch irq-redirect supprot
On Tue, Jun 10 2025 at 19:42, Tianyang Zhang wrote:
> From: Super User <root@...alhost.localdomain>
That's a valid developer name :)
> This series of patches introduces support for interrupt-redirect
> controllers, and this hardware feature will be supported on 3C6000
> for the first time
>
> change log:
> v3->v4
> 1.Provide reasonable comments on the modifications made to IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE
That's not really what I asked for:
"This change really wants to be seperate with a proper explanation and
not burried inside of this pile of changes."
Emphasis on _seperate_, which translates to:
"Put it into a seperate patch with a proper changelog explaining this
modification and why it is correct."
You still have burried this in the whole pile of unrelated changes.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists