[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1863f40-39ab-4e5b-984a-c48765ffde1c@lucifer.local>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:01:39 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, david@...hat.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, peterx@...hat.com, jannh@...gle.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org, adobriyan@...il.com, brauner@...nel.org,
josef@...icpanda.com, yebin10@...wei.com, linux@...ssschuh.net,
willy@...radead.org, osalvador@...e.de, andrii@...nel.org,
ryan.roberts@....com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
tjmercier@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] use per-vma locks for /proc/pid/maps reads and
PROCMAP_QUERY
Hi Suren,
I promised I'd share VMA merging scenarios so we can be absolutely sure we have
all cases covered, I share that below. I also included information on split.
Hopefully this is useful! And maybe we can somehow put in a comment or commit
msg or something somewhere? Not sure if a bit much for that though :)
Note that in all of the below we hold exclusive mmap, vma + rmap write locks.
## Merge with change to EXISTING VMA
### Merge both
start end
|<---->|
|-------********-------|
prev middle next
extend delete delete
1. Set prev VMA range [prev->vm_start, next->vmend)
2. Overwrite prev, middle, next nodes in maple tree with prev
3. Detach middle VMA
4. Free middle VMA
5. Detach next VMA
6. Free next VMA
### Merge left full
start end
|<--------->|
|-------*************
prev middle
extend delete
1. Set prev VMA range [prev->vm_start, end)
2. Overwrite prev, middle nodes in maple tree with prev
3. Detach middle VMA
4. Free middle VMA
### Merge left partial
start end
|<---->|
|-------*************
prev middle
extend partial overwrite
1. Set prev VMA range [prev->vm_start, end)
2. Set middle range [end, middle->vm_end)
3. Overwrite prev, middle (partial) nodes in maple tree with prev
### Merge right full
start end
|<--------->|
*************-------|
middle next
delete extend
1. Set next range [start, next->vm_end)
2. Overwrite middle, next nodes in maple tree with next
3. Detach middle VMA
4. Free middle VMA
### Merge right partial
start end
|<----->|
*************-------|
middle next
shrink extend
1. Set middle range [middle->vm_start, start)
2. Set next range [start, next->vm_end)
3. Overwrite middle (partial), next nodes in maple tree with next
## Merge due to introduction of proposed NEW VMA
These cases are easier as there's no existing VMA to either remove or partially
adjust.
### Merge both
start end
|<------>|
|-------..........-------|
prev (proposed) next
extend delete
1. Set prev VMA range [prev->vm_start, next->vm_end)
2. Overwrite prev, next nodes in maple tree with prev
3. Detach next VMA
4. Delete next VMA
### Merge left
start end
|<------>|
|-------..........
prev (proposed)
extend
1. Set prev VMA range [prev->vm_start, end)
2. Overwrite prev node in maple tree with newly extended prev
(This is what's used for brk() and bprm_mm_init() stack relocation in
relocate_vma_down() too)
### Merge right
start end
|<------>|
..........-------|
(proposed) next
extend
1. Set next VMA range [start, next->vm_end)
2. Overwrite next node in maple tree with newly extended next
## Split VMA
If new below:
addr
|-----.-----|
| new . |
|-----.-----|
vma
Otherwise:
addr
|-----.-----|
| . new |
|-----.-----|
vma
1. Duplicate vma
2. If new below, set new range to [vma-vm_start, addr)
3. Otherwise, set new range to [addr, vma->vm_end)
4. If new below, Set vma range to [addr, vma->vm_end)
5. Otherwise, set vma range to [vma->vm_start, addr)
6. Partially overwrite vma node in maple tree with new
Cheers, Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists