linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 5/9] sched/deadline: Hierarchical scheduling with DL on top of RT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250613112531.04cfa8ad@batman.local.home>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 11:25:31 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Yuri Andriaccio <yurand2000@...il.com>
Cc: juri.lelli@...hat.com, bsegall@...gle.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it, mgorman@...e.de,
 mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
 vschneid@...hat.com, yuri.andriaccio@...tannapisa.it
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/9] sched/deadline: Hierarchical scheduling with DL
 on top of RT

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:54:56 +0200
Yuri Andriaccio <yurand2000@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> thanks for your feedback.
> 
> > From changelog (and confirmed by changed lines), this patch might be doing too
> > many things at once and so it might be harder to review. Do you think it can
> > be split in smaller chunks?  
> 
> I'm currently working on splitting this patch (and the patch 8) in smaller
> chunks as you suggested, adding changes bit by bit.
> 
> I'll submit the updated version of the patchset for a RFC v2 as soon as I have
> it done.

Hi Yuri,

Thanks for doing this. On your next version, please add your own
Signed-off-by to each patch you send. Although you may not be the
author, you are posting them, which requires a Signed-off-by which
basically is you saying you have the right to post these patches.

Thanks,

-- Steve