[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250613172650.GA26022@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 19:26:50 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Benoît Sevens <bsevens@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Zander Work <zdw@...gle.com>, security@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()
and posix_cpu_timer_del()
If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
or debugger right after unlock_task_sighand().
If a concurrent posix_cpu_timer_del() runs at that moment, it won't be
able to detect timer->it.cpu.firing != 0: cpu_timer_task_rcu() and/or
lock_task_sighand() will fail.
Add the tsk->exit_state check into run_posix_cpu_timers() to fix this.
This fix is not needed if CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK=y, because
exit_task_work() is called before exit_notify(). But the check still
makes sense, task_work_add(&tsk->posix_cputimers_work.work) will fail
anyway in this case.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: Benoît Sevens <bsevens@...gle.com>
Fixes: 0bdd2ed4138e ("sched: run_posix_cpu_timers: Don't check ->exit_state, use lock_task_sighand()")
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 50e8d04ab661..2e5b89d7d866 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -1405,6 +1405,15 @@ void run_posix_cpu_timers(void)
lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+ /*
+ * Ensure that release_task(tsk) can't happen while
+ * handle_posix_cpu_timers() is running. Otherwise, a concurrent
+ * posix_cpu_timer_del() may fail to lock_task_sighand(tsk) and
+ * miss timer->it.cpu.firing != 0.
+ */
+ if (tsk->exit_state)
+ return;
+
/*
* If the actual expiry is deferred to task work context and the
* work is already scheduled there is no point to do anything here.
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
Powered by blists - more mailing lists