[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13066544.VsHLxoZxqI@tauon>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 19:55:12 +0200
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
To: Simo Sorce <simo@...hat.com>, Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Clemens Lang <cllang@...hat.com>, David Bohannon <dbohanno@...hat.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Module signing and post-quantum crypto public key algorithms
Am Freitag, 13. Juni 2025, 19:50:22 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb James
Bottomley:
Hi James,
> On Fri, 2025-06-13 at 13:33 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Premise: this problem can't be ignored, even if you think Quantum
> > Computers are BS, various government regulations are pushing all
> > commercial entities to require PQ signatures, so we have to deal with
> > this problem.
>
> I agree it's coming, but there's currently no date for post quantum
> requirement in FIPS, which is the main driver for this.
Perhaps [1] should be considered if you refer to FIPS?
Further, [2] also gives a timeline.
[1] https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/ir/8547/ipd
[2] https://www.nsa.gov/Press-Room/News-Highlights/Article/Article/3148990/
nsa-releases-future-quantum-resistant-qr-algorithm-requirements-for-national-
se/
Ciao
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists