[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250613191359.35078-6-sagis@google.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 12:13:32 -0700
From: Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>
To: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>, Ryan Afranji <afranji@...gle.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>, Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>, Roger Wang <runanwang@...gle.com>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
"Pratik R. Sampat" <pratikrajesh.sampat@....com>, Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 05/30] KVM: selftests: Update kvm_init_vm_address_properties()
for TDX
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Let kvm_init_vm_address_properties() initialize vm->arch.{s_bit, tag_mask}
similar to SEV.
Set shared bit position based on guest maximum physical address width
instead of maximum physical address width, because that is what KVM
uses, refer to setup_tdparams_eptp_controls(), and because maximum physical
address width can be different.
In the case of SRF, guest maximum physical address width is 48 because SRF
does not support 5-level EPT, even though the maximum physical address
width is 52.
Co-developed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
index d082d429e127..d9f4ecd6ffbc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
@@ -1166,10 +1166,19 @@ void kvm_get_cpu_address_width(unsigned int *pa_bits, unsigned int *va_bits)
void kvm_init_vm_address_properties(struct kvm_vm *vm)
{
+ uint32_t gpa_bits = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_GUEST_MAX_PHY_ADDR)
+
if (is_sev_vm(vm)) {
vm->arch.sev_fd = open_sev_dev_path_or_exit();
vm->arch.c_bit = BIT_ULL(this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_SEV_C_BIT));
vm->gpa_tag_mask = vm->arch.c_bit;
+ } else if (vm->type == KVM_X86_TDX_VM) {
+ TEST_ASSERT(gpa_bits == 48 || gpa_bits == 52,
+ "TDX: bad X86_PROPERTY_GUEST_MAX_PHY_ADDR value: %u", gpa_bits);
+ vm->arch.sev_fd = -1;
+ vm->arch.s_bit = 1ULL << (gpa_bits - 1);
+ vm->arch.c_bit = 0;
+ vm->gpa_tag_mask = vm->arch.s_bit;
} else {
vm->arch.sev_fd = -1;
}
--
2.50.0.rc2.692.g299adb8693-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists