[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250613192124.GA970861@bhelgaas>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:21:24 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Ziyue Zhang <quic_ziyuzhan@...cinc.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, jingoohan1@...il.com,
mani@...nel.org, lpieralisi@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, johan+linaro@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
kishon@...nel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
abel.vesa@...aro.org, kw@...ux.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
qiang.yu@....qualcomm.com, quic_krichai@...cinc.com,
quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: qcom: Add equalization settings for 8.0 GT/s
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 06:03:18PM +0800, Ziyue Zhang wrote:
> Adding lane equalization setting for 8.0 GT/s to enhance link stability
> and fix AER correctable errors reported on some platforms (eg. SA8775P).
s/Adding/Add/
s/fix AER correctable errors/avoid AER Correctable Errors/
so we know that (a) this avoids the errors (it's not some kind of
recovery), and (b) readers know that "Correctable Error" is something
that can be looked up in a spec.
> 8.0 GT/s and 16.0GT/s require the same equalization setting. This setting
> is programmed into a group of shadow registers, which can be switched to
> configure equalization for different GEN speeds by writing 00b, 01b
> to `RATE_SHADOW_SEL`.
s|16.0GT/s|16.0 GT/s| to match "8.0 GT/s"
s/different GEN speeds/different speeds/ (PCIe spec rev ("GEN") is not
a one-to-one mapping to speeds)
> @@ -18,33 +20,43 @@ void qcom_pcie_common_set_16gt_equalization(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> * GEN3_EQ_*. The RATE_SHADOW_SEL bit field of GEN3_RELATED_OFF
> * determines the data rate for which these equalization settings are
> * applied.
> + *
> + * TODO:
> + * EQ settings need to be added for 32.0 T/s in future
Drop this comment since it's not an indication of a problem in this
patch. The list of possible future work is infinite, and you can keep
track of a TODO list internally.
> */
> - reg = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, GEN3_RELATED_OFF);
> - reg &= ~GEN3_RELATED_OFF_GEN3_ZRXDC_NONCOMPL;
> - reg &= ~GEN3_RELATED_OFF_RATE_SHADOW_SEL_MASK;
> - reg |= FIELD_PREP(GEN3_RELATED_OFF_RATE_SHADOW_SEL_MASK,
> - GEN3_RELATED_OFF_RATE_SHADOW_SEL_16_0GT);
> - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, GEN3_RELATED_OFF, reg);
> + if (pcie_link_speed[pci->max_link_speed] < PCIE_SPEED_32_0GT)
> + max_speed = pcie_link_speed[pci->max_link_speed];
> + else
> + dev_warn(dev, "The target supports 32.0 GT/s, but the EQ setting for 32.0 GT/s is not configured.\n");
Drop period at end of message.
> - reg = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, GEN3_EQ_FB_MODE_DIR_CHANGE_OFF);
> - reg &= ~(GEN3_EQ_FMDC_T_MIN_PHASE23 |
> - GEN3_EQ_FMDC_N_EVALS |
> - GEN3_EQ_FMDC_MAX_PRE_CUSROR_DELTA |
> - GEN3_EQ_FMDC_MAX_POST_CUSROR_DELTA);
> - reg |= FIELD_PREP(GEN3_EQ_FMDC_T_MIN_PHASE23, 0x1) |
> - FIELD_PREP(GEN3_EQ_FMDC_N_EVALS, 0xd) |
> - FIELD_PREP(GEN3_EQ_FMDC_MAX_PRE_CUSROR_DELTA, 0x5) |
> - FIELD_PREP(GEN3_EQ_FMDC_MAX_POST_CUSROR_DELTA, 0x5);
> - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, GEN3_EQ_FB_MODE_DIR_CHANGE_OFF, reg);
> + for (speed = PCIE_SPEED_8_0GT; speed <= max_speed; ++speed) {
> + reg = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, GEN3_RELATED_OFF);
> + reg &= ~GEN3_RELATED_OFF_GEN3_ZRXDC_NONCOMPL;
> + reg &= ~GEN3_RELATED_OFF_RATE_SHADOW_SEL_MASK;
> + reg |= FIELD_PREP(GEN3_RELATED_OFF_RATE_SHADOW_SEL_MASK,
> + speed - PCIE_SPEED_8_0GT);
> + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, GEN3_RELATED_OFF, reg);
>
> - reg = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, GEN3_EQ_CONTROL_OFF);
> - reg &= ~(GEN3_EQ_CONTROL_OFF_FB_MODE |
> - GEN3_EQ_CONTROL_OFF_PHASE23_EXIT_MODE |
> - GEN3_EQ_CONTROL_OFF_FOM_INC_INITIAL_EVAL |
> - GEN3_EQ_CONTROL_OFF_PSET_REQ_VEC);
> - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, GEN3_EQ_CONTROL_OFF, reg);
> + reg = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, GEN3_EQ_FB_MODE_DIR_CHANGE_OFF);
> + reg &= ~(GEN3_EQ_FMDC_T_MIN_PHASE23 |
> + GEN3_EQ_FMDC_N_EVALS |
> + GEN3_EQ_FMDC_MAX_PRE_CUSROR_DELTA |
> + GEN3_EQ_FMDC_MAX_POST_CUSROR_DELTA);
Is "CUSROR" a typo for "CURSOR", or is "CUSROR" a real thing? (Either
way, it's not something you added, so not a problem with this patch.)
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists