linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove unused forward declaration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aEwy2Ud08nHHAdED@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:16:57 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove unused forward declaration

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 03:49:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:31:33PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:39:07PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > +Cc: Bart.
> > > 
> > > On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 10:43:46PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > The 'struct gpio' is not used in the code, remove unneeded forward declaration.
> > > > This seems to be a leftover for a 5 years.
> > > 
> > > Any comments on this, please?
> > 
> > looks good
> 
> Formal tag please?
> 
> > > It prevents us from moving forward with the killing the GPIO legacy APIs
> > > (it's not critical at all in this case, just an inconvenience for a `grep`,
> > > but still...).
> > > 
> > > I think we can take it via GPIO tree if there is no reply.
> > 
> > please do
> 
> Acked-by?

Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]