[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250613163103.3bca27cd.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:31:03 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "jgg@...dia.com"
<jgg@...dia.com>, Zhang Yu <zhangyu1@...rosoft.com>, Easwar Hariharan
<eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>, Saurabh Sengar
<ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vfio: Fix unbalanced vfio_df_close call in
no-iommu mode
On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 08:23:43 -0700
Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
>
> For devices with no-iommu enabled in IOMMUFD VFIO compat mode, the group
> open path skips vfio_df_open(), leaving open_count at 0. This causes a
> warning in vfio_assert_device_open(device) when vfio_df_close() is called
> during group close.
>
> The correct behavior is to skip only the IOMMUFD bind in the device open
> path for no-iommu devices. Commit 6086efe73498 omitted vfio_df_open(),
> which was too broad. This patch restores the previous behavior, ensuring
> the vfio_df_open is called in the group open path.
>
> Fixes: 6086efe73498 ("vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat validation out of vfio_iommufd_bind()")
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Tested-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@...ux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> v2: Use a fix from Jason
> ---
> drivers/vfio/group.c | 10 +++++-----
> drivers/vfio/iommufd.c | 3 ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> index c321d442f0da..8f5fe8a392de 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> @@ -192,18 +192,18 @@ static int vfio_df_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> * implies they expected translation to exist
> */
> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) ||
> - vfio_iommufd_device_has_compat_ioas(device, df->iommufd))
> + vfio_iommufd_device_has_compat_ioas(device, df->iommufd)) {
> ret = -EPERM;
> - else
> - ret = 0;
> - goto out_put_kvm;
> + goto out_put_kvm;
> + }
> }
>
> ret = vfio_df_open(df);
> if (ret)
> goto out_put_kvm;
>
> - if (df->iommufd && device->open_count == 1) {
> + if (df->iommufd && device->open_count == 1 &&
> + !vfio_device_is_noiommu(device)) {
Why do we need this?
int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev,
struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
{
u32 ioas_id;
int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
/* compat noiommu does not need to do ioas attach */
if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
return 0;
> ret = vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(device, df->iommufd);
> if (ret)
> goto out_close_device;
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> index c8c3a2d53f86..26c9c3068c77 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> @@ -54,9 +54,6 @@ void vfio_df_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
>
> - if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> - return;
> -
Why not keep this and add similar to vfio_df_iommufd_bind()? It seems
cleaner to me. Thanks,
Alex
> if (vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd)
> vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index 5046cae05222..ac2dbd4e5d04 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -506,17 +506,19 @@ static int vfio_df_device_first_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> {
> struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd = df->iommufd;
> - int ret;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
>
> if (!try_module_get(device->dev->driver->owner))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - if (iommufd)
> - ret = vfio_df_iommufd_bind(df);
> - else
> + if (iommufd) {
> + if (!vfio_device_is_noiommu(device))
> + ret = vfio_df_iommufd_bind(df);
> + } else {
> ret = vfio_device_group_use_iommu(device);
> + }
> if (ret)
> goto err_module_put;
>
> @@ -528,10 +530,12 @@ static int vfio_df_device_first_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> return 0;
>
> err_unuse_iommu:
> - if (iommufd)
> - vfio_df_iommufd_unbind(df);
> - else
> + if (iommufd) {
> + if (!vfio_device_is_noiommu(device))
> + vfio_df_iommufd_unbind(df);
> + } else {
> vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(device);
> + }
> err_module_put:
> module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
> return ret;
> @@ -546,10 +550,12 @@ static void vfio_df_device_last_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>
> if (device->ops->close_device)
> device->ops->close_device(device);
> - if (iommufd)
> - vfio_df_iommufd_unbind(df);
> - else
> + if (iommufd) {
> + if (!vfio_device_is_noiommu(device))
> + vfio_df_iommufd_unbind(df);
> + } else {
> vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(device);
> + }
> module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists