lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aEu9QQ0n8PEsLvRq@visitorckw-System-Product-Name>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:55:13 +0800
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
To: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
Cc: yury.norov@...il.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk, jstultz@...gle.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, sboyd@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	eleanor15x@...il.com, jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw,
	skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] cpumask: Introduce cpumask_first_but()

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 11:34:46AM +0800, I Hsin Cheng wrote:
> Switch the implementation of cpumask_any_but() to cpumask_first_but().
> Elimate the need to looping and make cpumask_any_but() a macro to wrap
> around cpumask_first_but(), just like cpumask_any() does, to make it
> more consistence.
> 
> The change brings some benefit in terms of code size shrinking of
> vmlinux, for NR_CPUS=64, it reduce 78 bytes in total, for
> NR_CPUS=4096, it reduce 2 bytes in total. The details are shown in the
> table [1].
> 
> Performance test is done using the test script [2]. Running the test for
> 10000 times, the origin implementation of cpumask_any_but() use 19665287
> nanoseconds in total, the new version of it, which is a wrapper around
> cpumask_first_but(), uses 19545574 nanoseconds. The difference is 119713
> nanoseconds.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor15x@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor15x@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>

This looks like an invalid SoB chain.
In our private discussion, I did agree that you're free to build upon
my previous patch for further development. Since this patch is almost
identical to mine, I assume you intended to include me and Yu-Chun as
co-authors. If that's the case, you should also add a Co-developed-by:
tag for me. It might also be helpful to add a Link: tag pointing to my
original patch for better traceability.

https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by

Regards,
Kuan-Wei

> Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
> ---
> [1]:
> 
> For NR_CPUS=64:
> $ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter vmlinux_old vmlinux_new
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 3/7 up/down: 46/-124 (-78)
> Function                                     old     new   delta
> irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu                 716     745     +29
> try_to_unmap_one                            3380    3391     +11
> try_to_migrate_one                          2451    2457      +6
> uncore_event_cpu_offline                     343     342      -1
> calibrate_delay_is_known                     236     235      -1
> tsc_store_and_check_tsc_adjust               506     495     -11
> arch_tlbbatch_flush                          302     288     -14
> tmigr_cpu_offline                            406     382     -24
> perf_event_exit_cpu_context                  592     565     -27
> flush_tlb_mm_range                          1561    1515     -46
> Total: Before=23390770, After=23390692, chg -0.00%
> 
> For NR_CPUS=4096:
> $ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter vmlinux_old vmlinux_new
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 7/3 up/down: 136/-138 (-2)
> Function                                     old     new   delta
> uncore_event_cpu_offline                     291     333     +42
> try_to_migrate_one                          2378    2413     +35
> flush_tlb_mm_range                          1476    1503     +27
> irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu                 741     754     +13
> tmigr_cpu_offline                            353     362      +9
> calibrate_delay_is_known                     183     192      +9
> arch_tlbbatch_flush                          296     297      +1
> tsc_store_and_check_tsc_adjust               484     482      -2
> perf_event_exit_cpu_context                  546     528     -18
> try_to_unmap_one                            3560    3442    -118
> Total: Before=23448698, After=23448696, chg -0.00%
> 
> [2]:
> static int __init test_init(void)
> {
>     struct cpumask test_mask;
>     ktime_t start_time, end_time;
>     s64 elapsed_ns;
>     unsigned int result;
>     unsigned int random_cpu;
>     int i;
> 
>     cpumask_copy(&test_mask, cpu_online_mask);
> 
>     start_time = ktime_get();
> 
>     for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
>         get_random_bytes(&random_cpu, sizeof(random_cpu));
>         random_cpu = random_cpu % nr_cpu_ids;
>         result = cpumask_any_but(&test_mask, random_cpu);
>     }
> 
>     end_time = ktime_get();
> 
>     elapsed_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(end_time, start_time));
> 
> 	pr_info("Total time: %lld ns\n", elapsed_ns);
> 
>     return 0;
> }
> 
> The test is running in the form of kernel module.
> The test machine is running ubuntu 24.04 on x86_64 machine with kernel
> version of v6.14.0, CPU type is AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D 8-Core Processor.
> 
> Best regards,
> I Hsin Cheng
> ---
>  include/linux/cpumask.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> index f9a868384083..d91630a97d76 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -408,22 +408,22 @@ unsigned int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *src)
>  	for_each_set_bit_from(cpu, cpumask_bits(mask), small_cpumask_bits)
>  
>  /**
> - * cpumask_any_but - return an arbitrary cpu in a cpumask, but not this one.
> + * cpumask_first_but - return the first cpu in a cpumask, but not this one.
>   * @mask: the cpumask to search
>   * @cpu: the cpu to ignore.
>   *
> - * Often used to find any cpu but smp_processor_id() in a mask.
> + * Often used to find the first cpu but smp_processor_id() in a mask.
>   * Return: >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus set.
>   */
>  static __always_inline
> -unsigned int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu)
> +unsigned int cpumask_first_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>  	unsigned int i;
>  
>  	cpumask_check(cpu);
> -	for_each_cpu(i, mask)
> -		if (i != cpu)
> -			break;
> +	i = cpumask_first(mask);
> +	if (i == cpu)
> +		i = cpumask_next(i, mask);
>  	return i;
>  }
>  
> @@ -864,6 +864,16 @@ void cpumask_copy(struct cpumask *dstp, const struct cpumask *srcp)
>   */
>  #define cpumask_any(srcp) cpumask_first(srcp)
>  
> +/**
> + * cpumask_any_but - pick an arbitrary cpu from *srcp but not the given cpu
> + * @srcp: the input cpumask
> + * @cpu: the cpu to ignore
> + *
> + * Often used to find any cpu but smp_processor_id() in a mask.
> + * Return: >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus set.
> + */
> +#define cpumask_any_but(srcp, cpu) cpumask_first_but(srcp, cpu)
> +
>  /**
>   * cpumask_any_and - pick an arbitrary cpu from *mask1 & *mask2
>   * @mask1: the first input cpumask
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ