[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <174979849395.608730.16231142843321576358@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 17:08:13 +1000
From: "NeilBrown" <neil@...wn.name>
To: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: "Al Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@...nel.org>, "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>, "Tyler Hicks" <code@...icks.com>,
"Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@...il.com>, "Kees Cook" <kees@...nel.org>,
"Joel Granados" <joel.granados@...nel.org>,
"Namjae Jeon" <linkinjeon@...nel.org>, "Steve French" <smfrench@...il.com>,
"Sergey Senozhatsky" <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS: change old_dir and new_dir in struct renamedata
to dentrys
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 at 01:38, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > Umm... No objections, as long as overlayfs part is correct; it seems
> > to be, but I hadn't checked every chunk there...
>
> Overlayfs parts looks okay too.
>
> A followup would be nice (e.g. make ovl_cleanup() take a dentry for
> the directory as well, etc) so that there's no need to have local
> variables for both the inode and dentry of the directory.
I am planning some followups and will include that in them.
I'll also be sure to test with fs-tests after consulting README.overlay
as you suggest elsewhere - thanks.
NeilBrown
Powered by blists - more mailing lists