linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf 3/7] bpf/riscv: prevent trampoline attachment when args location on stack is uncertain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250613-deny_trampoline_structs_on_stack-v1-3-5be9211768c3@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 09:37:12 +0200
From: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, 
 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, 
 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, 
 Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, 
 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, 
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, 
 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, 
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
 David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, 
 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, 
 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>, 
 Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>, 
 Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>, Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>, 
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, 
 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, 
 Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>, 
 Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, 
 Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, 
 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, 
 Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>, 
 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, 
 Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, 
 Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, 
 Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, 
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
Cc: ebpf@...uxfoundation.org, 
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, 
 Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet@...tlin.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>, 
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, 
 linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
 Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 3/7] bpf/riscv: prevent trampoline attachment when args
 location on stack is uncertain

When the target function receives more arguments than available
registers, the additional arguments are passed on stack, and so the
generated trampoline needs to read those to prepare the bpf context, but
also to prepare the target function stack when it is in charge of
calling it. This works well for scalar types, but if the value is a
struct, we can not know for sure the exact struct location, as it may
have been packed or manually aligned to a greater value.

Prevent wrong readings by refusing trampoline attachment if the target
function receives a struct on stack. While at it, move the max bpf args
check in the new function.

Fixes: 6801b0aef79d ("riscv, bpf: Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline")
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>
---
 arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 10e01ff06312d9f1e6e213bb069c6ea749ea9af2..ea3a1c3af6bc129057c16a4070c33dbf00e6c611 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -1005,6 +1005,24 @@ static int invoke_bpf_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *l, int args_off, int retval_of
 	return ret;
 }

+static int validate_args(const struct btf_func_model *m)
+{
+	int i, nr_arg_slots, nr_regs = 0;
+
+	if (m->nr_args > MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS)
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < m->nr_args; i++) {
+		nr_arg_slots = round_up(m->arg_size[i], 8) / 8;
+		if (nr_regs + nr_arg_slots > RV_MAX_REG_ARGS &&
+		    m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_STRUCT_ARG)
+			return -ENOTSUPP;
+		nr_regs += nr_arg_slots;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 					 const struct btf_func_model *m,
 					 struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks,
@@ -1069,8 +1087,12 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	if (flags & (BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK | BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY))
 		return -ENOTSUPP;

-	if (m->nr_args > MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS)
-		return -ENOTSUPP;
+	/* make sure that any argument can be located and processed by the
+	 * trampoline
+	 */
+	ret = validate_args(m);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;

 	for (i = 0; i < m->nr_args; i++)
 		nr_arg_slots += round_up(m->arg_size[i], 8) / 8;

-- 
2.49.0