Message-ID: <486a1110-5336-42fd-82b8-a7b1452bad65@tuxon.dev>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:39:50 +0300
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
 dakr@...nel.org, len.brown@...el.com, pavel@...nel.org,
 ulf.hansson@...aro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
 geert@...ux-m68k.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com,
 Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM: domains: Add devres variant for
 dev_pm_domain_attach()

Hi, Rafael,

On 09.06.2025 22:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 3:06 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 22:01:52 +0200
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 8:55 PM Dmitry Torokhov
>>> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 06:00:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 1:18 PM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The dev_pm_domain_attach() function is typically used in bus code alongside
>>>>>> dev_pm_domain_detach(), often following patterns like:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static int bus_probe(struct device *_dev)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>     struct bus_driver *drv = to_bus_driver(dev->driver);
>>>>>>     struct bus_device *dev = to_bus_device(_dev);
>>>>>>     int ret;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     // ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     ret = dev_pm_domain_attach(_dev, true);
>>>>>>     if (ret)
>>>>>>         return ret;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     if (drv->probe)
>>>>>>         ret = drv->probe(dev);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     // ...
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static void bus_remove(struct device *_dev)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>     struct bus_driver *drv = to_bus_driver(dev->driver);
>>>>>>     struct bus_device *dev = to_bus_device(_dev);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     if (drv->remove)
>>>>>>         drv->remove(dev);
>>>>>>     dev_pm_domain_detach(_dev);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When the driver's probe function uses devres-managed resources that depend
>>>>>> on the power domain state, those resources are released later during
>>>>>> device_unbind_cleanup().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Releasing devres-managed resources that depend on the power domain state
>>>>>> after detaching the device from its PM domain can cause failures.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For example, if the driver uses devm_pm_runtime_enable() in its probe
>>>>>> function, and the device's clocks are managed by the PM domain, then
>>>>>> during removal the runtime PM is disabled in device_unbind_cleanup() after
>>>>>> the clocks have been removed from the PM domain. It may happen that the
>>>>>> devm_pm_runtime_enable() action causes the device to be runtime-resumed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't use devm_pm_runtime_enable() then.
>>>>
>>>> What about other devm_ APIs? Are you suggesting that platform drivers
>>>> should not be using devm_clk*(), devm_regulator_*(),
>>>> devm_request_*_irq() and devm_add_action_or_reset()? Because again,
>>>> dev_pm_domain_detach() that is called by platform bus_remove() may shut
>>>> off the device too early, before cleanup code has a chance to execute
>>>> proper cleanup.
>>>>
>>>> The issue is not limited to runtime PM.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> If the driver specific runtime PM APIs access registers directly, this
>>>>>> will lead to accessing device registers without clocks being enabled.
>>>>>> Similar issues may occur with other devres actions that access device
>>>>>> registers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add devm_pm_domain_attach(). When replacing the dev_pm_domain_attach() and
>>>>>> dev_pm_domain_detach() in bus probe and bus remove, it ensures that the
>>>>>> device is detached from its PM domain in device_unbind_cleanup(), only
>>>>>> after all driver's devres-managed resources have been release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For flexibility, the implemented devm_pm_domain_attach() has 2 state
>>>>>> arguments, one for the domain state on attach, one for the domain state on
>>>>>> detach.
>>>>>
>>>>> dev_pm_domain_attach() is not part driver API and I'm not convinced at
>>>>
>>>> Is the concern that devm_pm_domain_attach() will be [ab]used by drivers?
>>>
>>> Yes, among other things.
>>
>> Maybe naming could make abuse at least obvious to spot? e.g.
>> pm_domain_attach_with_devm_release()
> 
> If I'm not mistaken, it is not even necessary to use devres for this.
> 
> You might as well add a dev_pm_domain_detach() call to
> device_unbind_cleanup() after devres_release_all().  There is a slight
> complication related to the second argument of it, but I suppose that
> this can be determined at the attach time and stored in a new device
> PM flag, or similar.
> 

I looked into this solution. I've tested it for all my failure cases and
went good.

> Note that dev->pm_domain is expected to be cleared by ->detach(), so
> this should not cause the domain to be detached twice in a row from
> the same device, but that needs to be double-checked.

The genpd_dev_pm_detach() calls genpd_remove_device() ->
dev_pm_domain_set(dev, NULL) which sets the dev->pm_domain = NULL. I can't
find any other detach function in the current code base.

The code I've tested for this solution is this one:

diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
index b526e0e0f52d..5e9750d007b4 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/wait.h>
 #include <linux/async.h>
+#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
 #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/devinfo.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -552,8 +553,11 @@ static void device_unbind_cleanup(struct device *dev)
        dev->dma_range_map = NULL;
        device_set_driver(dev, NULL);
        dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
-       if (dev->pm_domain && dev->pm_domain->dismiss)
-               dev->pm_domain->dismiss(dev);
+       if (dev->pm_domain) {
+               if (dev->pm_domain->dismiss)
+                       dev->pm_domain->dismiss(dev);
+               dev_pm_domain_detach(dev, dev->pm_domain->detach_power_off);
+       }
        pm_runtime_reinit(dev);
        dev_pm_set_driver_flags(dev, 0);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index 075ec1d1b73a..2459be6aecf4 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -1400,11 +1400,8 @@ static int platform_probe(struct device *_dev)
        if (ret)
                goto out;

-       if (drv->probe) {
+       if (drv->probe)
                ret = drv->probe(dev);
-               if (ret)
-                       dev_pm_domain_detach(_dev, true);
-       }

 out:
        if (drv->prevent_deferred_probe && ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
@@ -1422,7 +1419,6 @@ static void platform_remove(struct device *_dev)

        if (drv->remove)
                drv->remove(dev);
-       dev_pm_domain_detach(_dev, true);
 }

 static void platform_shutdown(struct device *_dev)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/common.c b/drivers/base/power/common.c
index 781968a128ff..4bd1e3c7f401 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/common.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/common.c
@@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ int dev_pm_domain_attach(struct device *dev, bool power_on)
        if (!ret)
                ret = genpd_dev_pm_attach(dev);

+       if (dev->pm_domain)
+               dev->pm_domain->detach_power_off = power_on;
+
        return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_domain_attach);
diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
index f0bd8fbae4f2..12e97e09e85c 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm.h
@@ -748,6 +748,7 @@ struct dev_pm_domain {
        void (*sync)(struct device *dev);
        void (*dismiss)(struct device *dev);
        int (*set_performance_state)(struct device *dev, unsigned int state);
+       bool detach_power_off;
 };

Rafael, Ulf, Dmitry, Jonathan, all,

Could you please let me know how do you consider this approach?

Thank you,
Claudiu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists