| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5b759f1a-fd74-4bcd-8f15-aa0d6ec6d9d4@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 11:24:02 +0200
From: neil.armstrong@...aro.org
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@...aro.org>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/msm/adreno: Check for recognized GPU before
bind
On 12/06/2025 18:08, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 6/12/25 6:04 PM, Alexey Klimov wrote:
>> On Mon Jun 9, 2025 at 7:24 PM BST, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> If we have a newer dtb than kernel, we could end up in a situation where
>>> the GPU device is present in the dtb, but not in the drivers device
>>> table. We don't want this to prevent the display from probing. So
>>> check that we recognize the GPU before adding the GPU component.
>>>
>>> v2: use %pOF
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>>> index 778e6ae7f137..0d12454b1f2e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>>> @@ -178,6 +178,26 @@ static int find_chipid(struct device_node *node, uint32_t *chipid)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +bool adreno_has_gpu(struct device_node *node)
>>> +{
>>> + const struct adreno_info *info;
>>> + uint32_t chip_id;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = find_chipid(node, &chip_id);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> + info = adreno_info(chip_id);
>>> + if (!info) {
>>> + pr_warn("%pOF: Unknown GPU revision: %"ADRENO_CHIPID_FMT"\n",
>>> + node, ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(chip_id));
>>> + return false;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return true;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int adreno_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>>> {
>>> static struct adreno_platform_config config = {};
>>> @@ -188,18 +208,17 @@ static int adreno_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> ret = find_chipid(dev->of_node, &config.chip_id);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> + /* We shouldn't have gotten this far if we can't parse the chip_id */
>>> + if (WARN_ON(ret))
>>> return ret;
>>
>> I just hit this with linux-next on qrb2210 RB1 [1].
>>
>> Is it expected an warning now or do we miss some device tree updates on
>> linux-next for RB1?
>>
>> I don't recall seeing such warnings previously.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alexey
>>
>> [1]:
>>
>> msm_dpu 5e01000.display-controller: bound 5e94000.dsi (ops dsi_ops [msm])
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 242 at drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c:224 adreno_bind+0x90/0x120 [msm]
>> Modules linked in: q6asm_dai q6routing q6afe_dai q6adm q6asm q6afe_clocks snd_q6dsp_common q6afe q6core apr pdr_interface qrtr_smd qcom_pd_mapper qcom_pdr_msg mcp251xfd ath10k_snoc snd_soc_wsa881x_i2c snd_soc_wsa881x_common can_dev lontium_lt9611uxc(+) ath10k_core ath mac80211 hci_uart btqca btbcm libarc4 msm snd_soc_sm8250 qrtr bluetooth drm_exec snd_soc_qcom_sdw qcom_q6v5_pas llcc_qcom snd_soc_qcom_common lmh qcom_wdt ocmem cfg80211 ecdh_generic qcom_pil_info pinctrl_sm6115_lpass_lpi gpu_sched ecc drm_display_helper rfkill qcom_q6v5 pinctrl_lpass_lpi qcom_sysmon pwrseq_core lpasscc_sm6115 dispcc_qcm2290 qcom_common snd_soc_lpass_va_macro cec snd_soc_lpass_rx_macro drm_dp_aux_bus snd_soc_lpass_tx_macro qcom_glink_smem gpucc_qcm2290 snd_soc_pm4125 mdt_loader snd_soc_lpass_macro_common qmi_helpers snd_soc_pm4125_sdw soundwire_qcom regmap_sdw slimbus qcom_pmic_tcpm qcom_usb_vbus_regulator drm_client_lib tcpm rtc_pm8xxx snd_soc_wcd_mbhc aux_hpd_bridge qcom_pon qcrypto soundwire_bus sha256 qcom_stats gpi
>> spi_geni_qcom i2c_qcom_geni rpmsg_ctrl libsha256_generic libsha256 rpmsg_char qcom_rng sha256_arm64 authenc icc_bwmon phy_qcom_qmp_usbc libdes typec phy_qcom_qusb2 display_connector i2c_gpio rmtfs_mem drm_kms_helper socinfo fuse drm backlight dm_mod ip_tables x_tables ipv6
>> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 242 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.16.0-rc1-next-20250612-00025-g0ce0d3974333-dirty #2 PREEMPT
>> Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Robotics RB1 (DT)
>> pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>> pc : adreno_bind+0x90/0x120 [msm]
>> lr : adreno_bind+0x50/0x120 [msm]
>> sp : ffff8000813f3580
>> x29: ffff8000813f3580 x28: ffff000008ae8800 x27: ffff000007c63700
>> x26: ffffca4a2814b860 x25: ffff000008b26880 x24: ffffca4a24922000
>> x23: ffffca4a249229d8 x22: ffff000009838800 x21: ffff000008b26880
>> x20: ffff000002ce4410 x19: ffffca4a2495a710 x18: 0000000000000006
>> x17: 6f5f697364207370 x16: 6f28206973642e30 x15: 0720072007200720
>> x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0101010101010101
>> x11: 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f x10: ffffca4a2866e1b2 x9 : 0000000000000002
>> x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f x6 : fefefeff2f383131
>> x5 : ffff00007fc1b968 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 000000000000001e
>> x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 0000000007000200 x0 : ffffca4a2495a710
>> Call trace:
>> adreno_bind+0x90/0x120 [msm] (P)
>> component_bind_all+0x100/0x23c
>> msm_drm_bind+0x148/0x3e0 [msm]
>> try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x16c/0x1e0
>> __component_add+0xa4/0x174
>> component_add+0x14/0x20
>> dsi_dev_attach+0x20/0x34 [msm]
>> dsi_host_attach+0x58/0x98 [msm]
>> devm_mipi_dsi_attach+0x34/0x90
>> lt9611uxc_attach_dsi.isra.0+0x94/0x124 [lontium_lt9611uxc]
>> lt9611uxc_probe+0x568/0x604 [lontium_lt9611uxc]
>> i2c_device_probe+0x158/0x32c
>> really_probe+0xbc/0x2b4
>> __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x120
>> driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x154
>> __driver_attach+0x90/0x1a0
>> bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xb8
>> driver_attach+0x24/0x30
>> bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x208
>> driver_register+0x68/0x124
>> i2c_register_driver+0x48/0xcc
>> lt9611uxc_driver_init+0x20/0x1000 [lontium_lt9611uxc]
>> do_one_initcall+0x60/0x1d4
>> do_init_module+0x54/0x23c
>> load_module+0x1730/0x1cc0
>> init_module_from_file+0x74/0xa0
>> __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x130/0x2f8
>> invoke_syscall+0x48/0x104
>> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc0/0xe0
>> do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28
>> el0_svc+0x2c/0x80
>> el0t_64_sync_handler+0x10c/0x138
>> el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c
>> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>> adreno 5900000.gpu: supply vdd not found, using dummy regulator
>> adreno 5900000.gpu: supply vddcx not found, using dummy regulator
>> msm_dpu 5e01000.display-controller: bound 5900000.gpu (ops a3xx_ops [msm])
>> [drm:dpu_kms_hw_init:1173] dpu hardware revision:0x60050000
>> dummy 1-0045: No cache used with register defaults set!
>> [drm] Initialized msm 1.12.0 for 5e01000.display-controller on minor 0
>> msm_dpu 5e01000.display-controller: [drm:adreno_request_fw [msm]] loaded qcom/a702_sqe.fw from new location
>
> Looks like we should be doing this instead
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> index 5e7307567239..16e7ac444efd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int adreno_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>
> info = adreno_info(config.chip_id);
> /* We shouldn't have gotten this far if we don't recognize the GPU: */
> - if (!WARN_ON(info))
> + if (WARN_ON(!info))
> return -ENXIO;
>
> config.info = info;
>
This does the trick and fixes the crash when sent to CI:
Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Thanks,
Neil
>
> Konrad
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists