linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove unused forward declaration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aEwMFVSPzc-mV1ve@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:31:33 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] MIPS: Alchemy: Remove unused forward declaration

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:39:07PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> +Cc: Bart.
> 
> On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 10:43:46PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The 'struct gpio' is not used in the code, remove unneeded forward declaration.
> > This seems to be a leftover for a 5 years.
> 
> Any comments on this, please?

looks good

> It prevents us from moving forward with the killing the GPIO legacy APIs
> (it's not critical at all in this case, just an inconvenience for a `grep`,
> but still...).
> 
> I think we can take it via GPIO tree if there is no reply.

please do

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]