[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250614151002.1582c732@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 15:10:02 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, dlechner@...libre.com,
nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, eraretuya@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/11] iio: accel: adxl345: extend inactivity time
for less than 1s
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 21:59:32 +0000
Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com> wrote:
> Inactivity event and free-fall event are actually the same type of sensor
> events. Hence, inactivity detection using a period of 1 to 255s can be
> extended to be used for lower periods than 1s for covering free-fall
> detection.
>
> When lower periods are defined, the driver automatically will setup
> threshold and period on the free-fall register, while using the
> inactivity threshold and period for periods above 1s. Using the
> free-fall register, no link bit will be set, and therefore no auto-sleep
> can be set in cases where also activity will be enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>
Approach seems reasonable. One comment on the code below.
> /**
> * adxl345_set_inact_time - Configure inactivity time explicitly or by ODR.
> * @st: The sensor state instance.
> - * @val_s: A desired time value, between 0 and 255.
> + * @val_int: The inactivity time, integer part.
> + * @val_fract: The inactivity time, fractional part when val_int is 0.
> *
> - * Inactivity time can be configured between 1 and 255 sec. If a val_s of 0
> + * Inactivity time can be configured between 1 and 255 sec. If a val_s of 0.00
> * is configured by a user, then a default inactivity time will be computed.
> *
> * In such case, it should take power consumption into consideration. Thus it
> @@ -355,16 +381,18 @@ static int adxl345_set_measure_en(struct adxl345_state *st, bool en)
> *
> * Return: 0 or error value.
> */
> -static int adxl345_set_inact_time(struct adxl345_state *st, u32 val_s)
> +static int adxl345_set_inact_time(struct adxl345_state *st, u32 val_int,
> + u32 val_fract)
> {
> unsigned int max_boundary = 255;
> unsigned int min_boundary = 10;
> - unsigned int val = min(val_s, max_boundary);
> + unsigned int val;
> enum adxl345_odr odr;
> unsigned int regval;
> int ret;
>
> - if (val == 0) {
> + if (val_int == 0 && val_fract == 0) {
> + /* Generated inactivity time based on ODR */
> ret = regmap_read(st->regmap, ADXL345_REG_BW_RATE, ®val);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -373,9 +401,41 @@ static int adxl345_set_inact_time(struct adxl345_state *st, u32 val_s)
>
> val = (adxl345_odr_tbl[odr][0] > max_boundary)
> ? min_boundary : max_boundary - adxl345_odr_tbl[odr][0];
> +
> + st->inact_time_ms = MILLI * val;
> +
> + /* Inactivity time in s */
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, ADXL345_REG_TIME_INACT, val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
Perhaps return in the good path here.
> + } else if (val_int == 0 && val_fract > 0) {
> + /* time < 1s, free-fall */
> +
> + /*
> + * Datasheet max. value is 255 * 5000 us = 1.275000 seconds.
> + *
> + * Recommended values between 100ms and 350ms (0x14 to 0x46)
> + */
> + st->inact_time_ms = DIV_ROUND_UP(val_fract, MILLI);
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, ADXL345_REG_TIME_FF,
> + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(val_fract, 5));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
and here
> + } else if (val_int > 0) {
> + /* Time >= 1s, inactivity */
> + st->inact_time_ms = MILLI * val_int;
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap, ADXL345_REG_TIME_INACT, val_int);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
and here.
> + } else {
Or given this covers any case where val_int > 0 do it first
and error out early?
> + /* Do not support negative or wrong input. */
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - return regmap_write(st->regmap, ADXL345_REG_TIME_INACT, val);
> + return 0;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists