[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeJg1Vi_-h+-j9Udzwf+ySv9oj7t2Kq_8irM8KgPGQDhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 22:02:23 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>, lars@...afoo.de,
Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com,
andy@...nel.org, corbet@....net, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, eraretuya@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 08/11] iio: accel: adxl345: add inactivity feature
On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 4:55 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
...
> > > if (type == ADXL345_ACTIVITY) {
> > > axis_ctrl = ADXL345_ACT_X_EN | ADXL345_ACT_Y_EN |
> > > ADXL345_ACT_Z_EN;
> > > } else {
> > > - axis_ctrl = 0x00;
> > > + axis_ctrl = ADXL345_INACT_X_EN | ADXL345_INACT_Y_EN |
> > > + ADXL345_INACT_Z_EN;
> > > }
> >
> > Now this can be as simple as
> >
> > axis_ctrl = ADXL345_ACT_X_EN;
>
> That flag is only set in the activity case. Confused with ADXL345_INACT_X_EN?
> (initially I thought you'd run into a bug!)
Ouch, you are right! Please, discard my above suggestion, it's indeed
simply wrong.
> > if (type == ADXL345_ACTIVITY)
> > axis_ctrl |= ADXL345_ACT_Y_EN | ADXL345_ACT_Z_EN;
> > else
> > axis_ctrl |= ADXL345_INACT_Y_EN | ADXL345_INACT_Z_EN;
> >
> > Yeah, I don't know how to make the diff better (it gets worse), but the end
> > result is better.
> >
> > One way, which I don't like much is to previously have this conditional written as:
> >
> > axis_ctrl = ADXL345_ACT_X_EN;
> > if (type == ADXL345_ACTIVITY)
> > axis_ctrl |= ADXL345_ACT_Y_EN | ADXL345_ACT_Z_EN;
> > else
> > axis_ctrl = 0;
> >
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists