[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANZih_QY5ki3nCGDitE-6FAmDi_dgc04WE_QqvOFwJeu912SVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 16:33:16 -0300
From: Andrew Ijano <andrew.ijano@...il.com>
To: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, andrew.lopes@...mni.usp.br, gustavobastos@....br,
dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org,
jstephan@...libre.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] iio: accel: sca3000: replace usages of internal
read data helpers by spi helpers
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 4:29 AM Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com> wrote:
>
...
>
> Looks good. Just one comment from me...
>
> > drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c | 166 +++++++++++++++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c
> > index bfa8a3f5a92f..d41759c68fb4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c
> > @@ -281,24 +281,6 @@ static int sca3000_write_reg(struct sca3000_state *st, u8
> > address, u8 val)
> > return spi_write(st->us, st->tx, 2);
> > }
> >
>
> ...
>
> >
> > static int sca3000_read_data(struct sca3000_state *st,
> > u8 reg_address_high,
> > - u8 *rx,
> > int len)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > @@ -974,18 +948,15 @@ static int sca3000_read_data(struct sca3000_state *st,
> > .tx_buf = st->tx,
> > }, {
> > .len = len,
> > - .rx_buf = rx,
> > + .rx_buf = st->rx,
> > }
> > };
> > -
> > st->tx[0] = SCA3000_READ_REG(reg_address_high);
> > +
> > ret = spi_sync_transfer(st->us, xfer, ARRAY_SIZE(xfer));
> > - if (ret) {
> > + if (ret)
> > dev_err(&st->us->dev, "problem reading register\n");
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > + return ret;
>
> Unless I'm missing something, the above seems unrelated to the rest of the patch.
>
Oh, I can see why that might feel unrelated. Actually, this was
related to the first version of the patch which was focused on
removing the duplicated behavior of sca3000_read_data() and
sca3000_read_data_short(), unifying it in only one function. Also,
with Andy's suggestions we cleaned up the function as you're seeing
here. However, we later replaced all usages of
sca3000_read_data_short() by spi helpers, leaving just one place
calling sca3000_read_data(), so this change isn't as necessary as
before.
Do you think it's still a valid cleanup for this patch or would you
prefer moving it to a separated one?
Thanks,
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists