[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <24F81191-5391-4208-9943-64440FCC19D8@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 10:52:44 -0300
From: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] rust: irq: add support for threaded IRQs and
handlers
Hi,
>>
>>> +
>>> +impl<T: ?Sized + ThreadedHandler, A: Allocator> ThreadedHandler for Box<T, A> {
>>> + fn handle_irq(&self) -> ThreadedIrqReturn {
>>> + T::handle_irq(self)
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + fn thread_fn(&self) -> IrqReturn {
>>> + T::thread_fn(self)
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/// A registration of a threaded IRQ handler for a given IRQ line.
>>> +///
>>> +/// Two callbacks are required: one to handle the IRQ, and one to handle any
>>> +/// other work in a separate thread.
>>> +///
>>> +/// The thread handler is only called if the IRQ handler returns `WakeThread`.
>>> +///
>>> +/// # Examples
>>> +///
>>> +/// The following is an example of using `ThreadedRegistration`. It uses a
>>> +/// [`AtomicU32`](core::sync::AtomicU32) to provide the interior mutability.
>>> +///
>>> +/// ```
>>> +/// use core::sync::atomic::AtomicU32;
>>> +/// use core::sync::atomic::Ordering;
>>> +///
>>> +/// use kernel::prelude::*;
>>> +/// use kernel::device::Bound;
>>> +/// use kernel::irq::flags;
>>> +/// use kernel::irq::ThreadedIrqReturn;
>>> +/// use kernel::irq::ThreadedRegistration;
>>> +/// use kernel::irq::IrqReturn;
>>> +/// use kernel::platform;
>>> +/// use kernel::sync::Arc;
>>> +/// use kernel::sync::SpinLock;
>>> +/// use kernel::alloc::flags::GFP_KERNEL;
>>> +/// use kernel::c_str;
>>> +///
>>> +/// // Declare a struct that will be passed in when the interrupt fires. The u32
>>> +/// // merely serves as an example of some internal data.
>>> +/// struct Data(AtomicU32);
>>> +///
>>> +/// // [`handle_irq`] takes &self. This example illustrates interior
>>> +/// // mutability can be used when share the data between process context and IRQ
>>> +/// // context.
>>> +///
>>> +/// type Handler = Data;
>>> +///
>>> +/// impl kernel::irq::request::ThreadedHandler for Handler {
>>> +/// // This is executing in IRQ context in some CPU. Other CPUs can still
>>> +/// // try to access to data.
>>> +/// fn handle_irq(&self) -> ThreadedIrqReturn {
>>> +/// self.0.fetch_add(1, Ordering::Relaxed);
>>> +///
>>> +/// // By returning `WakeThread`, we indicate to the system that the
>>> +/// // thread function should be called. Otherwise, return
>>> +/// // ThreadedIrqReturn::Handled.
>>> +/// ThreadedIrqReturn::WakeThread
>>> +/// }
>>> +///
>>> +/// // This will run (in a separate kthread) if and only if `handle_irq`
>>> +/// // returns `WakeThread`.
>>> +/// fn thread_fn(&self) -> IrqReturn {
>>> +/// self.0.fetch_add(1, Ordering::Relaxed);
>>> +///
>>> +/// IrqReturn::Handled
>>> +/// }
>>> +/// }
>>> +///
>>> +/// // This is running in process context.
>>> +/// fn register_threaded_irq(handler: Handler, dev: &platform::Device<Bound>) -> Result<Arc<ThreadedRegistration<Handler>>> {
>>> +/// let registration = dev.threaded_irq_by_index(0, flags::SHARED, c_str!("my-device"), handler)?;
>>
>> This doesn't compile (yet). I think this should be a "raw" example, i.e. the
>> function should take an IRQ number.
>>
>> The example you sketch up here is for platform::Device::threaded_irq_by_index().
>
> Yes, I originally had an example along the lines of what you mentioned. Except
> that with the changes in register() from pub to pub(crate) they stopped
> compiling.
>
> I am not sure how the doctest to kunit machinery works, but I was expecting
> tests to have access to everything within the module they're defined in, but
> this is apparently not the case.
Does anybody have any input on this? Again, I tried it already before sending
the current version but it does not compile due to pub(crate).
— Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists