[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d50ce593-a324-4b08-ae13-2264a41ebc6b@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 09:47:35 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"Dave.Martin@....com" <Dave.Martin@....com>,
"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
"thuth@...hat.com" <thuth@...hat.com>, "ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com" <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
"manali.shukla@....com" <manali.shukla@....com>,
"perry.yuan@....com" <perry.yuan@....com>, "Huang, Kai"
<kai.huang@...el.com>, "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
"kan.liang@...ux.intel.com" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"mario.limonciello@....com" <mario.limonciello@....com>,
"Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>,
"gautham.shenoy@....com" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
"xin@...or.com" <xin@...or.com>, "Bae, Chang Seok"
<chang.seok.bae@...el.com>, "fenghuay@...dia.com" <fenghuay@...dia.com>,
"peternewman@...gle.com" <peternewman@...gle.com>,
"Wieczor-Retman, Maciej" <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
"Eranian, Stephane" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH v14 00/32] fs,x86/resctrl: Support AMD Assignable
Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC)
Hi Tony,
On 6/13/25 16:41, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Babu,
>
> Compiling with "make W=1" you have several kerneldoc comments on new functions
> that do not describe their parameters.
>
> E.g.
>
> /**
> * resctrl_config_cntr() - Configure the counter ID for the event, RMID pair in
> * the domain.
> *
> * Assign the counter if @assign is true else unassign the counter. Reset the
> * associated non-architectural state.
> */
> static void resctrl_config_cntr(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> enum resctrl_event_id evtid, u32 rmid, u32 closid,
> u32 cntr_id, bool assign)
>
>
> Warning: fs/resctrl/monitor.c:984 function parameter 'r' not described in 'resctrl_config_cntr'
> Warning: fs/resctrl/monitor.c:984 function parameter 'd' not described in 'resctrl_config_cntr'
> Warning: fs/resctrl/monitor.c:984 function parameter 'evtid' not described in 'resctrl_config_cntr'
> Warning: fs/resctrl/monitor.c:984 function parameter 'rmid' not described in 'resctrl_config_cntr'
> Warning: fs/resctrl/monitor.c:984 function parameter 'closid' not described in 'resctrl_config_cntr'
> Warning: fs/resctrl/monitor.c:984 function parameter 'cntr_id' not described in 'resctrl_config_cntr'
> Warning: fs/resctrl/monitor.c:984 function parameter 'assign' not described in 'resctrl_config_cntr'
>
Yes. I noticed several of them.
Warning goes away after replacing "/**" with "/*".
Now I am not sure if we fix it with replacing with "/*" or adding
definitions for each of these parameters. There will be too many
repetitions. All these functions take r, d, eventid, and rmid as
parameters. Also these are static functions.
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists