[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250616184541.978458-1-kuni1840@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 11:44:21 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>
To: stfomichev@...il.com
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
jv@...sburgh.net,
kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
liuhangbin@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
sdf@...ichev.me,
syzbot+b8c48ea38ca27d150063@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
kuniyu@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: switch bond_miimon_inspect to rtnl lock
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 10:22:13 -0700
> Syzkaller reports the following issue:
>
> RTNL: assertion failed at ./include/net/netdev_lock.h (72)
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1141 at ./include/net/netdev_lock.h:72 netdev_ops_assert_locked include/net/netdev_lock.h:72 [inline]
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1141 at ./include/net/netdev_lock.h:72 __linkwatch_sync_dev+0x1ed/0x230 net/core/link_watch.c:279
>
> ethtool_op_get_link+0x1d/0x70 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:63
> bond_check_dev_link+0x3f9/0x710 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:863
> bond_miimon_inspect drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:2745 [inline]
> bond_mii_monitor+0x3c0/0x2dc0 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:2967
> process_one_work+0x9cf/0x1b70 kernel/workqueue.c:3238
> process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3321 [inline]
> worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf10 kernel/workqueue.c:3402
> kthread+0x3c5/0x780 kernel/kthread.c:464
> ret_from_fork+0x5d4/0x6f0 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
>
> As discussed in [0], the report is a bit bogus, but it exposes
> the fact that bond_miimon_inspect might sleep while its being
> called under RCU read lock. Convert bond_miimon_inspect callers
> (bond_mii_monitor) to rtnl lock.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+b8c48ea38ca27d150063@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b8c48ea38ca27d150063
> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aEt6LvBMwUMxmUyx@mini-arch [0]
> Fixes: f7a11cba0ed7 ("bonding: hold ops lock around get_link")
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 34 +++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index c4d53e8e7c15..ab40f0828680 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -2720,7 +2720,6 @@ static int bond_slave_info_query(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifslave *in
>
> /*-------------------------------- Monitoring -------------------------------*/
>
> -/* called with rcu_read_lock() */
> static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> {
> bool ignore_updelay = false;
> @@ -2729,17 +2728,17 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> struct slave *slave;
>
> if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
> - ignore_updelay = !rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
> + ignore_updelay = !rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
> } else {
> struct bond_up_slave *usable_slaves;
>
> - usable_slaves = rcu_dereference(bond->usable_slaves);
> + usable_slaves = rtnl_dereference(bond->usable_slaves);
>
> if (usable_slaves && usable_slaves->count == 0)
> ignore_updelay = true;
> }
>
> - bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
> + bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
> bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_NOCHANGE);
>
> link_state = bond_check_dev_link(bond, slave->dev, 0);
> @@ -2962,35 +2961,28 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
> if (!bond_has_slaves(bond))
> goto re_arm;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> + /* Race avoidance with bond_close cancel of workqueue */
> + if (!rtnl_trylock()) {
> + delay = 1;
> + should_notify_peers = false;
nit: we can remove this line.
Also, now call_netdevice_notifiers() can be moved up before rearm:.
> + goto re_arm;
> + }
> +
> should_notify_peers = bond_should_notify_peers(bond);
> commit = !!bond_miimon_inspect(bond);
> if (bond->send_peer_notif) {
nit: we don't need {} here.
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - if (rtnl_trylock()) {
> - bond->send_peer_notif--;
> - rtnl_unlock();
> - }
> - } else {
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + bond->send_peer_notif--;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists