[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb630ab5-3ea0-4469-b21c-28817a184205@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 15:30:40 -0500
From: "Bowman, Terry" <terry.bowman@....com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com, dave@...olabs.net,
dave.jiang@...el.com, alison.schofield@...el.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
ira.weiny@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
bp@...en8.de, ming.li@...omail.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com,
dan.carpenter@...aro.org, Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com,
kobayashi.da-06@...itsu.com, rrichter@....com, peterz@...radead.org,
fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
yazen.ghannam@....com, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/16] cxl/pci: Update __cxl_handle_cor_ras() to return
early if no RAS errors
On 6/12/2025 11:46 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 12:22:34 -0500
> Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com> wrote:
>
>> __cxl_handle_cor_ras() is missing logic to leave the function early in the
>> case there is no RAS error. Update __cxl_handle_cor_ras() to exit early in
>> the case there is no RAS errors detected after applying the mask.
>
> I'm all for this as sensible cleanup, but the 'missing' kind
> of suggest a bug to me whereas I don't see one.
> Perhaps reword?
>
Yes, I will reword the commit message.
-Terry
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 9 +++++----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
>> index 0f4c07fd64a5..f5f87c2c3fd5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
>> @@ -677,10 +677,11 @@ static void __cxl_handle_cor_ras(struct device *dev, u64 serial,
>>
>> addr = ras_base + CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_OFFSET;
>> status = readl(addr);
>> - if (status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK) {
>> - writel(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
>> - trace_cxl_aer_correctable_error(dev, serial, status);
>> - }
>> + if (!(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK))
>> + return;
>> + writel(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
>> +
>> + trace_cxl_aer_correctable_error(dev, serial, status);
>> }
>>
>> static void cxl_handle_endpoint_cor_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists