[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ed1d728-084b-42f7-9c15-8c97f565b555@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 11:26:03 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, jgg@...dia.com, kevin.tian@...el.com
Cc: will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org, praan@...gle.com,
yi.l.liu@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org, jsnitsel@...hat.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] iommufd/viommu: Support get_viommu_size and
viommu_init ops
On 6/14/25 14:35, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> To ease the for-driver iommufd APIs, get_viommu_size and viommu_init ops
> are introduced to replace the viommu_init op.
>
> Let the new viommu_init pathway coexist with the old viommu_alloc one.
>
> Since the viommu_alloc op and its pathway will be soon deprecated, try to
> minimize the code difference between them by adding a tentative jump tag.
>
> Note that this fails a !viommu->ops case from now on with a WARN_ON_ONCE
> since a vIOMMU is expected to support an alloc_domain_nested op for now,
> or some sort of a viommu op in the foreseeable future. This WARN_ON_ONCE
> can be lifted, if some day there is a use case wanting !viommu->ops.
>
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe<jgg@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen<nicolinc@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists