[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250616222629.620830f6@pumpkin>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 22:26:29 +0100
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>, Oleg Nesterov
<oleg@...hat.com>, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Biju
Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus
Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mul_u64_u64_div_u64: fix the division-by-zero
behavior
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 15:22:44 -0400 (EDT)
Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com> wrote:
> The current implementation forces a compile-time 1/0 division, which
> generates an undefined instruction (ud2 on x86) rather than a proper
> runtime division-by-zero exception.
>
> Change to trigger an actual div-by-0 exception at runtime, consistent
> with other division operations. Use a non-1 dividend to prevent the
> compiler from optimizing the division into a comparison.
Given there is a definite 'plan' to avoid adding more BUG() to code
I'm not at all sure generating UB here is right at all.
I don't know the best solution though.
To my mind returning zero for divide by zero and ~0 for overflow is least
likely to cause real grief later on in the called code.
David
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>
> ---
>
> Change from v1 (http://lore.kernel.org/all/q2o7r916-5601-11pn-30pn-8n5ns6p079o7@onlyvoer.pbz):
> - use OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR() in place of the open coded incantation.
>
> diff --git a/lib/math/div64.c b/lib/math/div64.c
> index 5faa29208bdb..bf77b9843175 100644
> --- a/lib/math/div64.c
> +++ b/lib/math/div64.c
> @@ -212,12 +212,13 @@ u64 mul_u64_u64_div_u64(u64 a, u64 b, u64 c)
>
> #endif
>
> - /* make sure c is not zero, trigger exception otherwise */
> -#pragma GCC diagnostic push
> -#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdiv-by-zero"
> - if (unlikely(c == 0))
> - return 1/0;
> -#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
> + /* make sure c is not zero, trigger runtime exception otherwise */
> + if (unlikely(c == 0)) {
> + unsigned long zero = 0;
> +
> + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(zero);
> + return ~0UL/zero;
> + }
>
> int shift = __builtin_ctzll(c);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists