[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9862b2c3-346b-49c5-80a9-37aac7e7b811@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 19:15:36 -0400
From: "Nirujogi, Pratap" <pnirujog@....com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>, Hao Yao
<hao.yao@...el.com>, Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@....com>,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
hverkuil@...all.nl, krzk@...nel.org, dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com,
hdegoede@...hat.com, jai.luthra@...asonboard.com,
tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, benjamin.chan@....com, bin.du@....com,
grosikop@....com, king.li@....com, dantony@....com, vengutta@....com,
dongcheng.yan@...el.com, jason.z.chen@...el.com, jimmy.su@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND] media: i2c: Add OV05C10 camera sensor driver
On 6/13/2025 8:05 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper
> caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> On 13/06/2025 12:02, Kieran Bingham wrote:
>> Quoting Hao Yao (2025-06-13 05:55:46)
>>> Hi Pratap,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your patch.
>>>
>>> This patch is written for your camera sensor module, which seems very
>>> different from those already applied on Dell laptops (some of "Dell Pro"
>>> series). Looking into the driver, I think this version will break the
>> Have there been existing efforts from Intel to upstream support for that
>> device?
>
> FWIW +1
>
> Qualcomm devices - Acer Swift 14 AI, HP OmniBook x14 both use this sensor.
>
> I'd expect though that aside from OF bindings, regulators and clocks
> that any upstream configuration with the right number of lanes would
> "just work", including this one from AMD.
>
> That has been the experience picking up OV02E10 and OV02C10 from the
> IPU6 repository where its ACPI binding and repurposing to OF/Qcom.
>
> So how incompatible could OV05C10 be between different x86/ACPI systems
> ? Less than the gap between x86/ACPI and Arm/OF you'd imagine.
>
> Getting any OV05C10 driver upstream would be great, we can work from
> there to bridge whatever gap needs be for !AMD.
>
Hi Bryan, thanks for your support and we will be happy to contribute too
to bridge the gaps and make the driver as generic as possible to support
both AMD && !AMD platforms.
Thanks,
Pratap
> ---
> bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists