[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aE-qxK6rbvfoeBr6@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 22:25:24 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: wangtao <tao.wangtao@...or.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
"sumit.semwal@...aro.org" <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
"kraxel@...hat.com" <kraxel@...hat.com>,
"vivek.kasireddy@...el.com" <vivek.kasireddy@...el.com>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"brauner@...nel.org" <brauner@...nel.org>,
"hughd@...gle.com" <hughd@...gle.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"amir73il@...il.com" <amir73il@...il.com>,
"benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com" <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
"Brian.Starkey@....com" <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
"jstultz@...gle.com" <jstultz@...gle.com>,
"tjmercier@...gle.com" <tjmercier@...gle.com>,
"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>,
"baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com" <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"wangbintian(BintianWang)" <bintian.wang@...or.com>,
yipengxiang <yipengxiang@...or.com>,
liulu 00013167 <liulu.liu@...or.com>,
hanfeng 00012985 <feng.han@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Implement dmabuf direct I/O via copy_file_range
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 09:33:55AM +0000, wangtao wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 09:32:20AM +0000, wangtao wrote:
> > > Are you suggesting adding an ITER_DMABUF type to iov_iter,
> >
> > Yes.
>
> May I clarify: Do all disk operations require data to pass through
> memory (reading into memory or writing from memory)? In the block layer,
> the bio structure uses bio_iov_iter_get_pages to convert iter_type
> objects into memory-backed bio_vec representations.
> However, some dmabufs are not memory-based, making page-to-bio_vec
> conversion impossible. This suggests adding a callback function in
> dma_buf_ops to handle dmabuf- to-bio_vec conversion.
bios do support PCI P2P tranfers. This could be fairly easily extended
to other peer to peer transfers if we manage to come up with a coherent
model for them. No need for a callback.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists