[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4cfbde5a-5bbe-462c-a52c-fe1c65aa3815@hogyros.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 14:53:35 +0900
From: Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@...yros.de>
To: jeffbai@...c.io, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Francois Dugast
<francois.dugast@...el.com>,
Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@...el.com>,
José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong@...el.com>, Matt Roper
<matthew.d.roper@...el.com>, Alan Previn
<alan.previn.teres.alexis@...el.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Mateusz Naklicki <mateusz.naklicki@...el.com>
Cc: intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Kexy Biscuit <kexybiscuit@...c.io>, Shang Yatsen <429839446@...com>,
Wenbin Fang <fangwenbin@....qq.com>, Haien Liang <27873200@...com>,
Jianfeng Liu <liujianfeng1994@...il.com>, Shirong Liu <lsr1024@...com>,
Haofeng Wu <s2600cw2@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/xe: enable driver usage on non-4KiB kernels
Hi,
On 6/13/25 10:11, Mingcong Bai via B4 Relay wrote:
> This patch series attempts to enable the use of xe DRM driver on non-4KiB
> kernel page platforms. This involves fixing the ttm/bo interface, as well
> as parts of the userspace API to make use of kernel `PAGE_SIZE' for
> alignment instead of the assumed `SZ_4K', it also fixes incorrect usage of
> `PAGE_SIZE' in the GuC and ring buffer interface code to make sure all
> instructions/commands were aligned to 4KiB barriers (per the Programmer's
> Manual for the GPUs covered by this DRM driver).
Tested on POWER9 (TalosII) with B580, comparing commit b8f759deb9 with
4k pages with the same plus these patches with 64k pages. I did not test
4k pages with these patches, I suspect that is already well covered by CI.
The Piglit test suite reports the exact same number of pass/fail/crash
for both configurations.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1310#note_2959331
Are there other tests that make sense? Piglit does not include video
playback, for example. Since I have a dGPU, I can't run SR-IOV tests,
though.
Simon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists