lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0ef8578-7a48-4dbf-a1b4-25284c3964e7@solid-run.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 11:47:13 +0000
From: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam
	<festevam@...il.com>
CC: Yazan Shhady <yazan.shhady@...id-run.com>, Mikhail Anikin
	<mikhail.anikin@...id-run.com>, Jon Nettleton <jon@...id-run.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun imx8mp
 hummingboard variants

Am 16.06.25 um 09:20 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 14/06/2025 16:20, Josua Mayer wrote:
>> +
>> +/* mikrobus spi */
>> +&ecspi2 {
>> +	num-cs = <1>;
>> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&mikro_spi_pins>;
>> +	status = "okay";
>> +
>> +	spi@0 {
>> +		reg = <0>;
>> +		compatible = "rohm,dh2228fv";
> NAK, such device DOES NOT EXIST. It is impossible to obtain dh2228fv, so
> your engineers were able to find it from Rohm?
Correct.
This description was used for hardware validation without a real dh2228fv.
>
> Drop entire node.
Will do for v2, thanks.
>
>
>> +		spi-max-frequency = <500000>;
>> +	};
>> +};
>> +

Did the separation of board features into various dtsi look acceptable?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ