[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83855c1a-c128-4762-9d6b-e17f2c4c8820@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 14:14:54 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, olteanv@...il.com,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, arnd@...db.de, larisa.grigore@....com,
Frank.li@....com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: Stub out dma_{alloc,free,map}_pages() API
On 16/06/2025 2:13 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 02:10:40PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
>> The change introduces consistency with the existing declarations in
>> dma-mapping.h. Surely there is value in consistency and it doesn't do any
>> harm to define new ones with stubs the same as the other ones. That way
>> when you change an existing device that has DMA stuff to use a new part of
>> the API you don't have to predict that it will behave differently to
>> another part of the API.
>
> Well, redoing the rest would definitively be nice, but so far no one
> has signed up to that.
>
>> I suppose it is possible to #ifdef out the DMA stuff in this driver, but
>> IMO it would be quite messy, and I don't think randomly not stubbing out
>> some functions is the right way to move towards fixing all the dependencies
>> in all drivers. We should continue with the stubs for now and fix whole
>> drivers one by one as a proper effort.
>
> Does the driver even work at all without DMA support?
>
Yes it does, it has a few modes that don't require it. Presumably we
can't just add a depends into the kconfig for all devices because they
might not be using DMA.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists