| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <aFF5wNjLq0frZwsl@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 10:20:48 -0400 From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com> To: Joy Zou <joy.zou@....com> Cc: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>, "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>, Ye Li <ye.li@....com>, "richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com" <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>, "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com" <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>, Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Add i.MX91 platform support On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 08:09:10AM +0000, Joy Zou wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 18:02:46 +0800, Joy Zou wrote: > > > The design of i.MX91 platform is very similar to i.MX93. > > > Extracts the common parts in order to reuse code. > > > > > > The mainly difference between i.MX91 and i.MX93 is as follows: > > > - i.MX91 removed some clocks and modified the names of some clocks. > > > - i.MX91 only has one A core. > > > - i.MX91 has different pinmux. > > > - i.MX91 has updated to new temperature sensor same with i.MX95. > > > > > > Joy Zou (8): > > > dt-bindings: soc: imx-blk-ctrl: add i.MX91 blk-ctrl compatible > > > arm64: dts: freescale: rename imx93.dtsi to imx91_93_common.dtsi > > > arm64: dts: imx93: move i.MX93 specific part from > > imx91_93_common.dtsi > > > to imx93.dtsi > > > arm64: dts: imx91: add i.MX91 dtsi support > > > arm64: dts: freescale: add i.MX91 11x11 EVK basic support > > > arm64: defconfig: enable i.MX91 pinctrl > > > pmdomain: imx93-blk-ctrl: mask DSI and PXP PD domain register on > > > i.MX91 > > > net: stmmac: imx: add i.MX91 support > > > > > > Pengfei Li (1): > > > dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add i.MX91 11x11 evk board > > > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 6 + > > > .../soc/imx/fsl,imx93-media-blk-ctrl.yaml | 55 +- > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile | 1 + > > > .../boot/dts/freescale/imx91-11x11-evk.dts | 878 ++++++++++ > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-pinfunc.h | 770 +++++++++ > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91.dtsi | 124 ++ > > > .../boot/dts/freescale/imx91_93_common.dtsi | 1215 ++++++++++++++ > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi | 1412 ++--------------- > > > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + > > > .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c | 2 + > > > drivers/pmdomain/imx/imx93-blk-ctrl.c | 15 + > > > 11 files changed, 3166 insertions(+), 1313 deletions(-) create mode > > > 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-11x11-evk.dts > > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-pinfunc.h > > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91.dtsi > > > create mode 100644 > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91_93_common.dtsi > > > > > > -- > > > 2.37.1 > > > > > My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this > > series. > Thanks for your reminder! > Have run DT checks and found this warning. The temperature bindings and driver patch v6 is reviewing. > So add note to the " [PATCH v5 5/9] arm64: dts: imx91: add i.MX91 dtsi support" patch. > Refer to the link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20250407-imx91tmu-v6-0-e48c2aa3ae44@nxp.com/ > BR tmu is not critial part, we can add after 91tmu binding merged. Frank > Joy Zou > > > > Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings are > > fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform maintainer whether > > these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply unless the platform > > maintainer has comments. > > > > If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then make sure > > dt-schema is up to date: > > > > pip3 install dtschema --upgrade > > > > > > This patch series was applied (using b4) to base: > > Base: attempting to guess base-commit... > > Base: tags/v6.16-rc1-6-g8a22d9e79cf0 (best guess, 6/7 blobs matched) > > > > If this is not the correct base, please add 'base-commit' tag (or use b4 which > > does this automatically) > > > > New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/' for > > 20250613100255.2131800-1-joy.zou@....com: > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-11x11-evk.dtb: > > /soc@...us@...00000/thermal-sensor@...82000: failed to match any > > schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx91-tmu'] > > > > > > > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists