[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKzKK0oB83B3EwX75NTFd55E0qQ=QwNpKv3hUf9Oe3ZF3AAzrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 11:31:17 +0800
From: Kuen-Han Tsai <khtsai@...gle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: prashanth.k@....qualcomm.com, hulianqin@...o.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, mwalle@...nel.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: gadget: u_serial: Fix race condition in TTY wakeup
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 10:17 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 09:21:47PM +0800, Kuen-Han Tsai wrote:
> > A race condition occurs when gs_start_io() calls either gs_start_rx() or
> > gs_start_tx(), as those functions briefly drop the port_lock for
> > usb_ep_queue(). This allows gs_close() and gserial_disconnect() to clear
> > port.tty and port_usb, respectively.
> >
> > Use the null-safe TTY Port helper function to wake up TTY.
> >
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 35f95fd7f234 ("TTY: usb/u_serial, use tty from tty_port")
> > Signed-off-by: Kuen-Han Tsai <khtsai@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > Explanation:
> > CPU1: CPU2:
> > gserial_connect() // lock
> > gs_close() // await lock
> > gs_start_rx() // unlock
> > usb_ep_queue()
> > gs_close() // lock, reset port_tty and unlock
> > gs_start_rx() // lock
> > tty_wakeup() // dereference
>
> Why isn't this up in the changelog?
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll move this part up in the changelog.
>
> >
> > Stack traces:
> > [ 51.494375][ T278] ttyGS1: shutdown
> > [ 51.494817][ T269] android_work: sent uevent USB_STATE=DISCONNECTED
> > [ 52.115792][ T1508] usb: [dm_bind] generic ttyGS1: super speed IN/ep1in OUT/ep1out
> > [ 52.516288][ T1026] android_work: sent uevent USB_STATE=CONNECTED
> > [ 52.551667][ T1533] gserial_connect: start ttyGS1
> > [ 52.565634][ T1533] [khtsai] enter gs_start_io, ttyGS1, port->port.tty=0000000046bd4060
> > [ 52.565671][ T1533] [khtsai] gs_start_rx, unlock port ttyGS1
> > [ 52.591552][ T1533] [khtsai] gs_start_rx, lock port ttyGS1
> > [ 52.619901][ T1533] [khtsai] gs_start_rx, unlock port ttyGS1
> > [ 52.638659][ T1325] [khtsai] gs_close, lock port ttyGS1
> > [ 52.656842][ T1325] gs_close: ttyGS1 (0000000046bd4060,00000000be9750a5) ...
> > [ 52.683005][ T1325] [khtsai] gs_close, clear ttyGS1
> > [ 52.683007][ T1325] gs_close: ttyGS1 (0000000046bd4060,00000000be9750a5) done!
> > [ 52.708643][ T1325] [khtsai] gs_close, unlock port ttyGS1
> > [ 52.747592][ T1533] [khtsai] gs_start_rx, lock port ttyGS1
> > [ 52.747616][ T1533] [khtsai] gs_start_io, ttyGS1, going to call tty_wakeup(), port->port.tty=0000000000000000
> > [ 52.747629][ T1533] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000001f8
>
> What is [khtsai] from?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
I added the "[khtsai]" logs for debugging and left them in the traces
because they clearly reveal the sequence of events that led to the
problem.
Regards,
Kuen-Han
Powered by blists - more mailing lists