lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whLENPVgWtHg5jt42he8Eb2pFzZngbvfSWXUmq64cyaAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 14:10:15 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, 
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, 
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] SHA-512 library functions

On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 13:37, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Okay.  For now I'll keep the test commits last and plan for a separate pull
> request with them, based on the first.  I fear I'll quickly run into
> interdependencies, in which case I'll need to fall back to "one pull request and
> spell things out very clearly".  But I'll try it.

Thanks.

Note that this "split it out" is really _only_ for when there's big
code movement and re-organization like this - it's certainly not a
general thing.

So you don't need to feel like I'm going to ask you to jump through
hoops in general for normal crypto library updates, this is really
only for these kinds of initial "big code movement" things.

> Just so it's clear, this is the diffstat of this patchset broken down by
> non-test code (patches 1-3 and 6-17) and tests (4-5):
>
>     Non-test:
>          65 files changed, 1524 insertions(+), 1756 deletions(-)
>
>     Test:
>          14 files changed, 2488 insertions(+)

Looks good. That's the kind of diffstat that makes me happy to pull:
the first one removes move code than it adds, and the second one very
clearly just adds tests.

So yes, this is the kind of thing that makes my life easy..

> Note that the non-test part includes kerneldoc comments.  I'll assume you aren't
> going to insist on those being in a separate "documentation" pull request...

Naah, they're relatively tiny, and don't skew the diffstat in huge ways.

             Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ