lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <PAWPR02MB92819222B0EFBDE604D6798A9B73A@PAWPR02MB9281.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 07:23:48 +0000
From: Johan Adolfsson <Johan.Adolfsson@...s.com>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew
 Davis <afd@...com>
CC: "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel
	<Kernel@...s.com>, Johan Adolfsson <Johan.Adolfsson@...s.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] leds: leds-lp50xx: Handle reg to get correct
 multi_index

Hi Jacek.

>From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
>Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 23:29
>To: Johan Adolfsson; Lee Jones; Pavel Machek; Rob Herring; Krzysztof Kozlowski; Conor Dooley; Andrew Davis
>Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; Kernel
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] leds: leds-lp50xx: Handle reg to get correct multi_index
>
>Hi Johan,
>
>On 6/16/25 13:25, Johan Adolfsson wrote:
..
>>   drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
>> index 02cb1565a9fb..344791b6c575 100644
>> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
>> @@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ static int lp50xx_probe_dt(struct lp50xx *priv)
>>                       return -ENOMEM;
>>
>>               fwnode_for_each_child_node(child, led_node) {
>> +                     int multi_index = num_colors;

>Any specific reason for initializing this to num_colors?

Sorry - leftover from initial patch where I kept the original behavior if reg was not set.
Another patch version coming up soon (assuming failing on reg not set is the agreed upon solution).

>>
>--
>Best regards,
>Jacek Anaszewski

Best regards
/Johan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ