[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250617075520.GH750234@unreal>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 10:55:20 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Cc: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@...ux.ibm.com>,
samir <samir@...ux.ibm.com>,
Naman Jain <namjain@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>,
srivatsa@...il.mit.edu, Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sched/topology: improve topology_span_sane speed
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 08:34:53AM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Steve,
<...>
> Leon, could you also paste the output of numactl -H from within the
> guest please. I'm wondering if the NUMA topology makes a difference
> here somehow.
[leonro@vm ~]$ sudo numactl -H
available: 5 nodes (0-4)
node 0 cpus: 0 1
node 0 size: 2927 MB
node 0 free: 1603 MB
node 1 cpus: 2 3
node 1 size: 3023 MB
node 1 free: 3008 MB
node 2 cpus: 4 5
node 2 size: 3023 MB
node 2 free: 3007 MB
node 3 cpus: 6 7
node 3 size: 3023 MB
node 3 free: 3002 MB
node 4 cpus: 8 9
node 4 size: 3022 MB
node 4 free: 2718 MB
node distances:
node 0 1 2 3 4
0: 10 39 38 37 36
1: 39 10 38 37 36
2: 38 38 10 37 36
3: 37 37 37 10 36
4: 36 36 36 36 10
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Prateek
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists