[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=QUbe-koU-BEhEJ1-7AafC0kGcG6HOhiVaR1TWqPoLFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 10:05:25 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Eunsoo Eun <ewhk9887@...il.com>
Cc: rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thangaraj Samynathan <thangaraj.s@...rochip.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi-pci1xxxx: Drop MSI-X usage as unsupported by
DMA engine
On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 10:14 AM Eunsoo Eun <ewhk9887@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Thangaraj Samynathan <thangaraj.s@...rochip.com>
>
> Removes MSI-X from the interrupt request path, as the DMA engine used by
> the SPI controller does not support MSI-X interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thangaraj Samynathan <thangaraj.s@...rochip.com>
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250612023059.71726-1-thangaraj.s@microchip.com
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
For some reason this came as a "1/2" patch in the same email thread as
a Rust one, and that got things confusing. This patch looks
spurious/bogus, i.e. it is already in mainline, and it is not authored
nor signed by you, and it is not even numbered as "2/2".
Do you know what happened?
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists