linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] hwmon: (pmbus/tps53679) Add support for TPS53685

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250617105141.4081335-1-Chiang.Brian@inventec.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 18:51:41 +0800
From: Brian Chiang <chiang.brian@...entec.com>
To: linux@...ck-us.net
Cc: alex@...ti.fr,
	aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
	chiang.brian@...entec.com,
	corbet@....net,
	jdelvare@...e.com,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	palmer@...belt.com,
	paul.walmsley@...ive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] hwmon: (pmbus/tps53679) Add support for TPS53685

> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 09:15:43 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> On 6/10/25 03:25, Chiang Brian wrote:
> ...
> > @@ -263,6 +282,10 @@ static int tps53679_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> >   		info->identify = tps53681_identify;
> >   		info->read_word_data = tps53681_read_word_data;
> >   		break;
> > +	case tps53685:
> > +	    info->pages = TPS53679_PAGE_NUM;
> > +	    info->identify = tps53685_identify;
> > +		break;
> 
> 0-day rightfully complains about the bad alignment above.
> 
> If you want this patch to be applied for the next kernel release,
> I would suggest to copy the hardware monitoring list on the first patch
> of the series. Without it, I get
> 
> WARNING: DT compatible string "ti,tps53685" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> #296: FILE: drivers/hwmon/pmbus/tps53679.c:316:
> +	{.compatible = "ti,tps53685", .data = (void *)tps53685},
> 
> Since I am not copied on the first patch of the series, that patch has to be applied
> through a different maintainer tree, and I have to wait until that is the case.
> Not that I understand the logic behind it, but I mentioned that before, so I assume
> this is on purpose.

Thank you for the feedback. I'll address both issues in v10:

1. Fix the indentation alignment in the switch case
2. CC linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org on all patches in the series

I apologize for the oversight, this wasn't intentional, but rather due to 
my automated CC generation only considering per-patch maintainers.

For v10, I'll ensure all the devicetree and hwmon maintainer lists are 
included on all patches so you can see the complete series.

Best Regards,
Brian Chiang